Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35723588›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

The role of surface adhesion on the macroscopic wrinkling of biofilms.

Steffen Geisel, Eleonora Secchi, Jan Vermant

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Single-cell lysis patterns morphogenesis of eDNA in the matrix ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Host Material Viscoelasticity Determines Wrinkling of Fungal Films.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Active interface bulging inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. A new wrinkle in biofilm structure.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steffen GeiselLaboratory for Soft Materials, Department of Materials, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1121-3103
Eleonora SecchiDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0949-9085
Jan VermantLaboratory for Soft Materials, Department of Materials, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0352-0656
ETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms, bacterial communities of cells encased by a self-produced matrix, exhibit a variety of three-dimensional structures. Specifically, channel networks formed within the bulk of the biofilm have been identified to play an important role in the colonies' viability by promoting the transport of nutrients and chemicals. Here, we study channel formation and focus on the role of the adhesion of the biofilm matrix to the substrate in

Indexed as

BiofilmsPseudomonas aeruginosaMicroscopy, Confocalbiofilmbucklingmicrofluidicsphysics of living systemsPseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID35723588
PMCPMC9208754
OpenAlexW4283170142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.