Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35723570›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2022

Chemotherapy Regimens Received by Women With BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants for Early Stage Breast Cancer Treatment.

Allison W Kurian, Paul Abrahamse, Ann S Hamilton, Jennifer L Caswell-Jin, Scarlett L Gomez, Timothy J Hofer, Kevin C Ward, Steven J Katz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Allison W KurianDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6175-9470
Paul AbrahamseDepartment of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health and Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ann S HamiltonDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jennifer L Caswell-JinDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Scarlett L GomezDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics and Hellen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5143-4867
Timothy J HoferDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan and Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kevin C WardDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Steven J KatzDepartment of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health and Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan · USStanford University · USEmory University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Genetic testing, treatment use, and mortality after diagnosis of breast and ovarian cancer: The Georgia-California GeneLINK InitiativeR01CA225697 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KATZ, STEVEN J., KURIAN, ALLISON W. · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
CDC HHS 5NU58DP006352NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic testing is widespread among breast cancer patients; however, no guideline recommends using germline genetic testing results to select a chemotherapy regimen. It is unknown whether breast cancer patients who carry pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1 and/or 2 (BRCA1/2) or other cancer-associated genes receive different chemotherapy regimens than noncarriers.

methodsWe linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry records from Georgia and California to germline genetic testing results from 4 clinical laboratories. Patients who 1) had stages I-III breast cancer, either hormone receptor (HR) positive and HER2 negative or triple negative (TNBC), diagnosed in 2013-2017; 2) received chemotherapy; and 3) were linked to genetic results were included. Chemotherapy details were extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results text fields completed by registrars. We examined whether PV carriers received more intensive regimens (HR-positive,HER2-negative: ≥3 drugs including an anthracycline; TNBC: ≥4 drugs including an anthracycline and platinum) and/or less standard breast cancer agents (a platinum). All statistical tests were 2-sided.

resultsAmong 2293 patients, 1451 had HR-positive, HER2-negative disease, and 842 had TNBC. On multivariable analysis of women with HR-positive, HER2-negative disease, receipt of a more intensive chemotherapy regimen varied statistically significantly by genetic results (P = .02), with platinum receipt more common among BRCA1/2 PV carriers (odds ratio = 2.44, 95% confidence interval = 1.36 to 4.38; P < .001). Among women with TNBC, chemotherapy agents did not vary significantly by genetic results.

conclusionBRCA1/2 PV carriers with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer had twofold higher odds than noncarriers of receiving a platinum, as part of a more intensive chemotherapy regimen. This likely represents overtreatment and emphasizes the need to monitor how genetic testing results are managed in oncology practice.

Indexed as

BRCA2 ProteinTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAnthracyclinesBRCA1 ProteinFemaleGenetic TestingHumansPlatinumAnthracyclinesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinPlatinum

Identifiers

PMID35723570
PMCPMC9305849
OpenAlexW4283171893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.