Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35723510›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

Evaluating denoising strategies in resting-state functional magnetic resonance in traumatic brain injury (EpiBioS4Rx).

Marina Weiler, Raphael F Casseb, Brunno M de Campos, Julia S Crone, Evan S Lutkenhoff, Paul M Vespa, Martin M Monti, EpiBioS4Rx Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marina WeilerDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8839-2234
Raphael F CassebNeuroimaging Laboratory, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Brunno M de CamposNeuroimaging Laboratory, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Julia S CroneDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Evan S LutkenhoffDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Paul M VespaDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Martin M MontiDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
EpiBioS4Rx Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resting-state functional MRI is increasingly used in the clinical setting and is now included in some diagnostic guidelines for severe brain injury patients. However, to ensure high-quality data, one should mitigate fMRI-related noise typical of this population. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ability of different preprocessing strategies to mitigate noise-related signal (i.e., in-scanner movement and physiological noise) in functional connectivity (FC) of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. We applied nine commonly used denoising strategies, combined into 17 pipelines, to 88 TBI patients from the Epilepsy Bioinformatics Study for Anti-epileptogenic Therapy clinical trial. Pipelines were evaluated by three quality control (QC) metrics across three exclusion regimes based on the participant's head movement profile. While no pipeline eliminated noise effects on FC, some pipelines exhibited relatively high effectiveness depending on the exclusion regime. Once high-motion participants were excluded, the choice of denoising pipeline becomes secondary - although this strategy leads to substantial data loss. Pipelines combining spike regression with physiological regressors were the best performers, whereas pipelines that used automated data-driven methods performed comparatively worse. In this study, we report the first large-scale evaluation of denoising pipelines aimed at reducing noise-related FC in a clinical population known to be highly susceptible to in-scanner motion and significant anatomical abnormalities. If resting-state functional magnetic resonance is to be a successful clinical technique, it is crucial that procedures mitigating the effect of noise be systematically evaluated in the most challenging populations, such as TBI datasets.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticImage Processing, Computer-AssistedArtifactsClinical Trials as TopicHead MovementsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopyartifacthead motionmotion correctionnuisance regressionphysiological noiseTBI

Identifiers

PMID35723510
PMCPMC9491287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.