Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35723400›Full record

ArticleCurrent issues in molecular biology2022

Circulating Exosomal miR-1290 for Diagnosis of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Hyeji Jeon, Su Min Seo, Tae Wan Kim, Jaesung Ryu, Hyejeong Kong, Si Hyeong Jang, Yong Soo Jang, Kwang Seock Kim, Jae Hoon Kim, Seongho Ryu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current issues in molecular biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The Role of microRNA in the Prognosis and Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hyeji JeonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Korea.
Su Min SeoSoonchunhyang Institute of Med-Bio Sciences (SIMS), Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan 31151, Korea.
Tae Wan KimSoonchunhyang Innovative Convergence Research Center, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Korea.
Jaesung RyuSoonchunhyang Innovative Convergence Research Center, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Korea.
Hyejeong KongSoonchunhyang Innovative Convergence Research Center, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Korea.
Si Hyeong JangDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Korea.
Yong Soo JangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3470-7675
Kwang Seock KimSoonchunhyang Innovative Convergence Research Center, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3329-1225
Jae Hoon KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 05029, Korea.
Seongho RyuSoonchunhyang Institute of Med-Bio Sciences (SIMS), Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan 31151, Korea.
Seob JeonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5230-1997
Soonchunhyang University · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

Bio and Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government NRF-2019M3E5D1A02069073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to develop a new diagnostic biomarker for identifying serum exosomal miRNAs specific to epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and to find out target gene of the miRNA for exploring the molecular mechanisms in EOC. A total of 84 cases of ovarian masses and sera were enrolled, comprising EOC (n = 71), benign ovarian neoplasms (n = 13). We detected expression of candidate miRNAs in the serum and tissue of both benign ovarian neoplasm group and EOC group using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Immunohistochemistry were constructed using formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue to detect expression level of suppressor of cytokine signaling 4 (SOCS4). In the EOC group, miRNA-1290 was significantly overexpressed in serum exosomes and tissues as compared to benign ovarian neoplasm group (fold change ≥ 2, p < 0.05). We observed area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for miR-1290, using a cut-off of 0.73, the exosomal miR-1290 from serum had AUC, sensitivity, and specificity values of 0.794, 69.2 and 87.3, respectively. In immunohistochemical study, expression of SOCS4 in EOC was lower than that in benign ovarian neoplasm. Serum exosomal miR-1290 could be considered as a biomarker for differential diagnosis of EOC from benign ovarian neoplasm and SOCS4 might be potential target gene of miR-1290 in EOC.

Indexed as

biomarkerearly diagnosisexosomal microRNAovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID35723400
PMCPMC8928998
OpenAlexW4205505918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.