Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35723270›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2023

Shared Decision-Making Concerning Anal Cancer Screening in Persons With Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

Edward R Cachay, Tari Gilbert, Robert Deiss, Wm Christopher Mathews

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical Predictors and Outcomes of Invasive Anal Cancer for People With HIV in an Inception Cohort.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edward R CachayDepartment of Medicine, Owen Clinic, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Tari GilbertDepartment of Medicine, Owen Clinic, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Robert DeissDepartment of Medicine, Owen Clinic, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Wm Christopher MathewsDepartment of Medicine, Owen Clinic, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

UC San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR001442 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S, HOGARTH, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2024
$88.3M
VirologyP30AI036214 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Maile Ann Young Karris · 1994 to 2026
$78.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001442NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI036214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (aHSIL) is the immediate precursor of anal cancer. Anal cytology is a recommended screening test to identify aHSIL among people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; PWH). Heterogeneity of risk for invasive anal cancer among PWH suggests the value of a shared decision-making framework regarding screening.

methodsUsing a longitudinal HIV cohort with a comprehensive anal cancer screening program, we estimated the adjusted probabilities of having aHSIL on the first anal cytology. We used logistic regression models with inverse probability weighting to account for differential screening in the cohort and to construct a predicted probability nomogram for aHSIL. Sensitivity analysis was performed to estimate aHSIL prevalence corrected for misclassification bias.

resultsOf 8139 PWH under care between 2007 and 2020, 4105 (49.8%) underwent at least 1 anal cytology test. First-time cytology aHSIL was present in 502 (12.2%) PWH. The adjusted probability of having aHSIL varied from 5% to 18% depending on patient characteristics. Prespecified factors in the aHSIL prediction model included nadir CD4 cell count, ethnicity, race, age, sex, gender identity, and HIV risk factors. The ability of the model to discriminate cytological aHSIL was modest, with an area under the curve of 0.63 (95% confidence interval, .60-.65).

conclusionsPWH are at increased risk for aHSIL and invasive anal cancer. Risk, however, varies by patient characteristics. Individual risk factor profiles predictive of aHSIL can be modeled and operationalized as nomograms to facilitate shared decision-making conversations concerning anal cancer screening.

Indexed as

Anus NeoplasmsCarcinoma in SituHIV InfectionsSquamous Intraepithelial LesionsAnal CanalDecision Making, SharedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGender IdentityHIVHumansMaleanal cancerHIVnomogramscreeningshared-decision

Identifiers

PMID35723270
PMCPMC10226749
OpenAlexW4283165914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.