Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35723149›Full record

ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2022

Employers' attitude, intention, skills and barriers in relation to employment of vulnerable workers.

G Hulsegge, W Otten, H A van de Ven, A M Hazelzet, R W B Blonk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

G HulseggeSustainable Productivity and Employability, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Leiden, The Netherlands.
W OttenSustainable Productivity and Employability, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Leiden, The Netherlands.
H A van de VenSustainable Productivity and Employability, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Leiden, The Netherlands.
A M HazelzetSustainable Productivity and Employability, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Leiden, The Netherlands.
R W B BlonkSustainable Productivity and Employability, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known why some organizations employ vulnerable workers and others do not.

objectiveTo explore the relationships between the attitude, intention, skills and barriers of employers and employment of vulnerable workers.

methodsWe included 5,601 inclusive organizations (≥1% of employees had a disability, was long-term unemployed or a school dropout) and 6,236 non-inclusive organizations of the Netherlands Employers Work Survey 2014-2019. We operationalized employer factors based on the Integrative Model of Behavioral Prediction as attitude (negative impact), intention (mission statement regarding social inclusion), skills (human resources policies and practices), and barriers (economic conditions and type of work). We used multivariate-adjusted logistic regression models.

resultsCompared to non-inclusive organizations, inclusive organizations had a more negative attitude (OR:0.81) and a stronger intention to employ vulnerable workers (OR:6.09). Regarding skills, inclusive organizations had more inclusive human resources practices (OR:4.83) and initiated more supporting human resources actions (OR:4.45). Also, they adapted more work conditions towards the needs of employees (OR:1.52), negotiated about work times and absenteeism (OR:1.49), and had general human resources practices on, for example, employability (OR:1.78). Inclusive organizations had less barriers reflected by better financial results (OR:1.32), more employment opportunities (OR:1.33) and more appropriate work tasks (OR:1.40).

conclusionsOverall, inclusive organizations reported more positive results on the employer factors of the Integrative Model of Behavioral Prediction, except for a more negative attitude. The more negative attitude might reflect a more realistic view on the efforts to employ vulnerable groups, and suggests that other unmeasured emotions and beliefs are more positive.

Indexed as

IntentionPersons with DisabilitiesAttitudeEmploymentHumansOccupationsDisabilityemployershiring intentionoccupational rehabilitationretention

Identifiers

PMID35723149
PMCPMC9484112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.