ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2022
Automated Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease by Capturing Impairments in Multiple Cognitive Domains with Multiple Drawing Tasks.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosis accuracy of touchscreen-based testings for major neurocognitive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Age and ageing · 2025Pooled it
- Community-based assisted screening for mild cognitive impairment using gait and handwriting kinematic parameters analysis.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Trial
- AI-Based Measurement Tools for Intrinsic Capacity in Older Adults: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of digital clock drawing test for Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Touchscreen-Based Tests for Mild Cognitive Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Developing an accessible dementia assessment tool: Leveraging a residual network, the trail making test, and demographic data.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- Alzheimer's disease digital biomarkers multidimensional landscape and AI model scoping review.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Characteristics of Drawing Process Differentiate Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia with Lewy Bodies.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutomatic analysis of the drawing process using a digital tablet and pen has been applied to successfully detect Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, most studies focused on analyzing individual drawing tasks separately, and the question of how a combination of drawing tasks could improve the detection performance thus remains unexplored.
objectiveWe aimed to investigate whether analysis of the drawing process in multiple drawing tasks could capture different, complementary aspects of cognitive impairments, with a view toward combining multiple tasks to effectively improve the detection capability.
methodsWe collected drawing data from 144 community-dwelling older adults (27 AD, 65 MCI, and 52 cognitively normal, or CN) who performed five drawing tasks. We then extracted motion- and pause-related drawing features for each task and investigated the associations of the features with the participants' diagnostic statuses and cognitive measures.
resultsThe drawing features showed gradual changes from CN to MCI and then to AD, and the changes in the features for each task were statistically associated with cognitive impairments in different domains. For classification into the three diagnostic categories, a machine learning model using the features from all five tasks achieved a classification accuracy of 75.2%, an improvement by 7.8% over that of the best single-task model.
conclusionOur results demonstrate that a common set of drawing features from multiple drawing tasks can capture different, complementary aspects of cognitive impairments, which may lead to a scalable way to improve the automated, reliable detection of AD and MCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.