Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35723001›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2022

Residential green space in association with the methylation status in a CpG site within the promoter region of the placental serotonin receptor

Yinthe Dockx, Esmée Bijnens, Nelly Saenen, Raf Aerts, Jean-Marie Aerts, Lidia Casas, Andy Delcloo, Nicolas Dendoncker, Catherine Linard, Michelle Plusquin and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular pathways in placental-fetal development and disruption.Molecular and cellular endocrinology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Yinthe DockxCentre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3992-1742
Esmée BijnensCentre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Nelly SaenenCentre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Raf AertsCentre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Jean-Marie AertsDivision Animal and Human Health Engineering, Department of Biosystems (BIOSYST), KU LeuvenMeasure, Model & Manage Bioresponses (M3-BIORES), Leuven, Belgium.
Lidia CasasCenter for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health, Leuven University (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium.
Andy DelclooRoyal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium.
Nicolas DendonckerDepartment of Geography, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.
Catherine LinardDepartment of Geography, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.
Michelle PlusquinCentre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Michiel StasDivision Forest, Nature and Landscape, Department Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
An Van NieuwenhuyseCenter for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health, Leuven University (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium.
Jos Van OrshovenDivision Forest, Nature and Landscape, Department Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ben SomersDivision Forest, Nature and Landscape, Department Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Tim NawrotCentre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Hasselt University · BEResearch Institute for Nature and Forest · BEUniversity of Namur · BEKU Leuven · BELaboratoire National de Santé · LURoyal Meteorological Institute of Belgium · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Green space could influence adult cognition and childhood neurodevelopment , and is hypothesized to be partly driven by epigenetic modifications. However, it remains unknown whether some of these associations are already evident during foetal development. Similar biological signals shape the developmental processes in the foetal brain and placenta.Therefore, we hypothesize that green space can modify epigenetic processes of cognition-related pathways in placental tissue, such as DNA-methylation of the serotonin receptor

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticParks, RecreationalPlacentaReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2AFemaleHumansMaternal ExposurePregnancyPromoter Regions, GeneticHTR2A protein, humanReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2ADNA methylationepigeneticGreen spaceHTR2Aplacentaserotonin

Identifiers

PMID35723001
PMCPMC9665132
OpenAlexW4283166355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.