Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35722712›Full record

ArticleActa neurologica Scandinavica2022

Prevalence and affective correlates of subjective cognitive decline in patients with de novo Parkinson's disease.

Ning Yang, Yuanyuan Ju, Jingru Ren, Haidong Wang, Peishan Li, Houxu Ning, Jiaping Tao, Weiguo Liu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Subjective cognitive complaints in cognitively unimpaired Parkinson's disease: Associations with affective burden, motor severity, and awareness-related processes.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ning YangDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yuanyuan JuCerebrovascular Disease Center, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jingru RenDepartment of Neurology, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9186-6621
Haidong WangDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Peishan LiDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Houxu NingDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jiaping TaoDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5759-4722
Weiguo LiuDepartment of Neurology, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5916-9837
Nanjing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital · CNNanjing Brain Hospital · CN

Funding

Medical Science and Technology Development Foundation of Nanjing YKK20094National Key Research and Development Program of China 2016YFC1306600National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFC1310302National Natural Science Foundation of China 81571348Science and Technology Development Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Jiangsu Province 2020ZX17Science and Technology Program of Jiangsu Province BE2019611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe novel concept of subjective cognitive decline (SCD) in Parkinson's disease (PD) refers to subjective cognitive impairment without concurrent objective cognitive deficits. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and affective correlates of SCD in de novo PD patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 139 de novo PD patients underwent comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation. PD patients with SCD (PD-SCD) did not meet the diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment in PD (PD-MCI) based on the Movement Disorder Society Level II Criteria and were defined by a Domain-5 Score ≥1 on the Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire. Affective symptoms were measured using the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA).

resultsIn de novo PD cohort, the prevalence of SCD was 28.1%. PD-SCD patients performed significantly better than PD-MCI patients on tests of five cognitive domains. The more commonly affected domains in PD-SCD patients were memory (28.2%) and attention/working memory (25.6%). Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that PD-SCD was significantly associated with both HAMD (β = 4.518, 95% CI = 0.754-8.281, p = .019) and HAMA scores (β = 4.259, 95% CI = 1.054-7.464, p = .010). Furthermore, binary logistic regression analysis revealed that higher HAMD (OR = 1.128, 95% CI = 1.019-1.249, p = .020) and HAMA scores (OR = 1.176, 95% CI = 1.030-1.343, p = .017) increased the risk of PD-SCD.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that SCD is highly prevalent in de novo PD patients. The presence of PD-SCD is suggestive of an underlying affective disorder.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionParkinson DiseaseHumansNeuropsychological TestsPrevalenceSurveys and Questionnairesanxietyde novo Parkinson's diseasedepressionprevalencesubjective cognitive decline

Identifiers

PMID35722712
PMCPMC9545461
OpenAlexW4283204626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.