ArticleCroatian medical journal2022
Human whole mitochondrial genome sequencing and analysis: optimization of the experimental workflow.
Article in Croatian medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate critical steps in Illumina® Human mtDNA Genome assay: target enrichment, limited-cycle PCR, and library normalization, in order to optimize the protocol for analysis of whole mitochondrial genomes from human reference samples.
methodsThree long-range high-fidelity DNA polymerases (PlatinumTM PCR SuperMix High Fidelity, LA Taq® Hot Start, and PrimeSTAR® GXL) were tested for their performance in the amplification of mtDNA fragments. Sequencing results of ten samples, as well as negative controls, which underwent library preparation with 12 and 15 cycles in limited-cycle PCR were compared. Additionally, two library normalization methods were compared: bead-based normalization vs quantification and individual normalization.
resultsPrimeSTAR® GXL performed best for mitochondrial DNA enrichment. Increment of amplification cycles to 15 in limited-cycle PCR step did not affect either the sequencing process or variant calling. Library quantification combined with individual library-by-library dilution outperformed bead-based normalization.
conclusionOptimizations described herein provide beneficial insights for laboratories aiming at implementation and/or advancement of similar massively parallel sequencing workflows (eg, small genomes, PCR amplicons, and plasmids).
Indexed as
Identifiers
35722691PMC9284014W4283219582What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.