Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35722657›Full record

ArticleThe journal of machine learning for biomedical imaging2022

A review and experimental evaluation of deep learning methods for MRI reconstruction.

Arghya Pal, Yogesh Rathi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of machine learning for biomedical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nested CNN architecture for three-dimensional dose distribution prediction in tomotherapy for prostate cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  14. Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications in Magnetic Particle Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Denoising diffusion MRI: Considerations and implications for analysis.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arghya PalDepartment of Psychiatry and Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Yogesh RathiDepartment of Psychiatry and Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Next generation in-vivo diffusion imaging at submillimeter resolutionR01MH116173 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Yogesh Rathi, Kawin Setsompop · 2018 to 2026
$6.2M
Mapping the superficial white matter connectome of the human brain using ultra high resolution multi-contrast diffusion MRIR01MH125860 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MAKRIS, NIKOLAOS, O'DONNELL, LAUREN JEAN · 2021 to 2025
$4.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116173NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the success of deep learning in a wide range of applications, neural network-based machine-learning techniques have received significant interest for accelerating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition and reconstruction strategies. A number of ideas inspired by deep learning techniques for computer vision and image processing have been successfully applied to nonlinear image reconstruction in the spirit of compressed sensing for accelerated MRI. Given the rapidly growing nature of the field, it is imperative to consolidate and summarize the large number of deep learning methods that have been reported in the literature, to obtain a better understanding of the field in general. This article provides an overview of the recent developments in neural-network based approaches that have been proposed specifically for improving parallel imaging. A general background and introduction to parallel MRI is also given from a classical view of k-space based reconstruction methods. Image domain based techniques that introduce improved regularizers are covered along with k-space based methods which focus on better interpolation strategies using neural networks. While the field is rapidly evolving with plenty of papers published each year, in this review, we attempt to cover broad categories of methods that have shown good performance on publicly available data sets. Limitations and open problems are also discussed and recent efforts for producing open data sets and benchmarks for the community are examined.

Indexed as

Deep Leaningk-space reconstructionmachine learningMRI Reconstructionparallel MRI

Identifiers

PMID35722657
PMCPMC9202830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.