Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35722605›Full record

ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2022

Green endoscopy: using quality improvement to develop sustainable practice.

James B Maurice, Andrew Rochford, Sarah Marshall, Shaji Sebastian, Anjan Dhar, Bu'Hussain Hayee, Green Endoscopy group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07171853 (The Carbon Footprint Study of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Various Techniques of Colonic Polypectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07171853 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Carbon Footprint Study of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Various Techniques of Colonic Polypectomy

TypeobservationalSponsorKing Chulalongkorn Memorial HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled362ConditionsColonoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Green endoscopy: A review of strategies for sustainable practice.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Green endoscopy: practical implementation.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Gastroenterology 2022: Groundhog Day.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James B MauriceHepatology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1530-5328
Andrew RochfordGastroenterology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1381-6853
Sarah MarshallSt Mark's Bowel Cancer Screening Centre, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK.
Shaji SebastianGastroenterology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.
Anjan DharGastroenterology, County Durham & Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Bishop Auckland, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8964-2031
Bu'Hussain HayeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1670-8815
Green Endoscopy group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

endoscopyenvironmental health

Identifiers

PMID35722605
PMCPMC9186032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.