Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35722541›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Virtual Clinical Listening Groups for Psychological Intervention With University Students in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Lucas Bloc, Juliana Lima de Araújo, João Marcos Leite, Sarah Rebeca Barreto, Karla Carneiro, Anna Karynne Melo, Georges Boris, Virginia Moreira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucas BlocPostgraduate Program in Psychology, University of Fortaleza (UNIFOR), Fortaleza, Brazil.
Juliana Lima de AraújoPostgraduate Program in Psychology, University of Fortaleza (UNIFOR), Fortaleza, Brazil.
João Marcos LeiteLaboratório de Psicopatologia e Clínica Humanista-Fenomenológica (APHETO), Fortaleza, Brazil.
Sarah Rebeca BarretoLaboratório de Psicopatologia e Clínica Humanista-Fenomenológica (APHETO), Fortaleza, Brazil.
Karla CarneiroLaboratório de Psicopatologia e Clínica Humanista-Fenomenológica (APHETO), Fortaleza, Brazil.
Anna Karynne MeloLaboratório de Psicopatologia e Clínica Humanista-Fenomenológica (APHETO), Fortaleza, Brazil.
Georges BorisPostgraduate Program in Psychology, University of Fortaleza (UNIFOR), Fortaleza, Brazil.
Virginia MoreiraPostgraduate Program in Psychology, University of Fortaleza (UNIFOR), Fortaleza, Brazil.
Universidade de Fortaleza · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pandemic has affected people's mental health and university students are considered one of the most vulnerable groups, encouraging the development of psychological interventions that can minimize the suffering and illness of this public. Among the possibilities of intervention, virtual clinical listening groups were created which, during the period of social isolation, had the purpose of opening up a listening space for university students suffering from emotional distress. The focus of the group meetings was how university students were experiencing the pandemic, as well as the consequences of this experience. In this article, we discuss virtual clinical listening groups as a form of psychological intervention in the mental health care of university students during the COVID-19 pandemic at a university in northeastern Brazil. This is a qualitative study that began with 274 university students and 5 psychologists who facilitated the listening groups. We used as instruments the registration forms, the participation records of the virtual clinical listening groups and the field diaries written by the facilitators after each meeting. We described in the results the collected data and, from the field diaries, the themes that emerged in the various meetings were listed and analyzed in dialogue with the literature. At the end of the psychological screening process, 117 students participated in the 17 organized groups, with an average of 8 university students per group. Among the main motivations for participating in virtual clinical listening groups, we highlight: the desire to share experiences, a search for control of anxiety, depression and stress, care for mental health, a willingness to promote listening to psychological support for themselves and for others, and self-knowledge. We discuss the nuances in the process of forming the listening groups and the characteristics of the participants, as well as a central element of the group process, which is the establishment of bonds and mutual help among the participants. Feeling vulnerable and the fear of contamination is an element of suffering and, above all, of stress experienced by university students. The group presented itself as an alternative of mutual care in the pandemic context.

Indexed as

COVID-19listening groupsmental healthpsychological interventionuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID35722541
PMCPMC9203821
OpenAlexW4281671627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.