ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
The prognostic value of chemotherapy or/and radiotherapy in adenoid cystic carcinoma and adenoid basal carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the uterine cervix with metastasis 10 years postsurgery: Case report and literature review.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Adenoid basal cell carcinoma: An underrecognized cervical malignancy.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) and adenoid basal carcinoma (ABC) are rare cervical cancer types and have unclarified clinicopathological features and survival outcomes. This retrospective study focused on predicting the value of radiotherapy or/and chemotherapy for cervical ACC and ABC patients. Methods: The clinical data of cervical ACC and ABC patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1973 and 2013 were included. The clinicopathological features, Kaplan-Meier curves, and overall survival (OS) of patients were evaluated. The prognostic nomogram was established based on the multivariate Cox models. To validate the nomogram prediction, Harrell's Concordance index (C-index) was calculated and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. Results: A total of 84 cervical ACC and 82 ABC patients were identified, and ABC patients had better 10-year OS than ACC patients (60.81% Conclusions: Cervical ABC patients had a better survival time than cervical ACC patients. We found that increased age was potentially an independent risk factor for poor prognosis, surgical patients had a better prognosis, and radiotherapy, or chemotherapy combination treatment had an unfavorable tendency to prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.