Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35722418›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Function, quality-of-life and complications after sacrospinous ligament fixation using an antegrade reusable suturing device (ARSD-Ney) at 6 and 12 months: a retrospective cohort study.

Ping Wang, Mingyue Li, Huating Sun, Liping Ni, Honghong Cai, Wen Fan, Jinhua Zhou, Juan Wang, Hongmei Ding, Youguo Chen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ping Wang *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Mingyue Li *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Huating SunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Liping NiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Honghong CaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Wen FanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jinhua ZhouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Juan WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Hongmei DingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Youguo ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Fangrong ShenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common pathology in the female population. Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) is one of the traditional transvaginal procedures for POP and high sacrospinous ligament fixation (h-SSLF) optimizes it using an antegrade reusable suturing device (ARSD-Ney). Previous studies on h-SSLF have focused on the correction of anatomical positions, with less assessment of patients' function, quality of life and complications. In this study, we evaluated post-operative complications, function, and quality-of-life after h-SSLF to confirm the safety and effectiveness of it. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that included 71 patients between 2018 and 2021: 50 patients for h-SSLF and 21 patients for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) according to patient age and background, POP-Q stage, patient preference, and so on. A clinical evaluation took place before surgery and was repeated at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Intra- and post-operative complications and anatomical results were recorded. Patients completed self-administered questionnaires for functional pelvic problems [Pelvic Floor Disability Index-20 (PFDI-20)], quality of life [Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7)], and sexual function [Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12 (PISQ-12)] at each medical visit. Results: Patients in both h-SSLF and LSC groups were similar in terms of demographic characteristics except for surgery time (86.04±28.70 Conclusions: This retrospective cohort study confirmed the positive results of h-SSLF in terms of improvement in function and quality of life following treatment for pelvic organ prolapse.

Indexed as

bowel functionPelvic organ prolapse (POP)quality of lifesacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF)sexuality

Identifiers

PMID35722418
PMCPMC9201128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.