ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
The research status of central venous catheterization-associated thrombosis: a bibliometrics analysis.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Central venous catheters are associated with a significantly increased risk of venous thrombosis due to a variety of factors. This bibliometric study analyzed the current research status in the field of central venous catheterization associated thrombosis. Methods: Related literatures in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) database were identified using the search terms "central venous catheter" and "thrombosis". The CiteSpace software was used to analysis literature data including country, institution, author, and journal distribution characteristics, as well as the use of keywords, and the number of times the country, institution, author, or journal were cited. Co-occurrence maps between countries, institutions, authors, and keywords were constructed. Results: A total of 2,810 related literature records were identified, with a total of 29,920 citations. The number of documents and the number of citations generally showed an increasing annual trend. These documents were mainly published from developed countries in Europe and North America, including USA, Britain, Italy, and France. Cooperation between institutions tended to be limited to the same country, and collaboration between authors tended to be within the same institutions. Keyword analysis demonstrated that in recent years, the research on thrombosis related to central venous catheterization has been more targeted, with an increasing focus on evidence-based medicine. Conclusions: Future research may focus more on the prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment of asymptomatic central venous catheterization-related thrombosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.