ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Potential prognostic value of the lymph node ratio and its correlation with circulating sex hormone concentration in pathological T1/2 breast cancer patients: a retrospective study.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The lymph node ratio (LNR) is an additional informative factor complementing anatomic TNM staging in breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of LNR in the cancer-specific and overall survival (OS) in a cohort of pT1/2 breast cancer patients and examine its correlation with circulating sex hormone concentrations in postmenopausal cases of the cohort from eastern China islands. Methods: Clinical and pathological characteristics, preoperational sex hormone and tumor markers concentrations, and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and OS were analyzed retrospectively in 732 pathological T1/2 breast cancer patients. Results: The LNR was calculated, and the cut-off value was defined as 0.042 by receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curve according to the patient's mortalities. Patients with LNR ≥0.042 exhibited worse BCSS and OS than others (P<0.001) in pT1/2 breast cancer. Among patients with non-triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and TNBC subtypes, the LNR ≥0.042 group also exhibited worse BCSS and OS than the LNR <0.042 group (P=0.003, 0.001, and P=0.032, 0.001, respectively). In univariate analysis, unfavorable BCSS and OS were both related with LNR ≥0.042 (P=0.001, <0.001). However multivariate analysis demonstrated TNBC subtypes were independent predictor for BCSS and OS [hazard ratio (HR) =1.449, 95% CI: 1.097-1.914, P=0.009; HR =1.365, 95% CI: 1.093-1.705, P=0.006, respectively]. Notably, Pearson or spearman correlation analysis revealed follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and, luteinizing hormone (LH) levels were significantly negatively associated with the LNR (P=0.007, 0.011, respectively) in postmenopausal cases, whereas CA153, CA125 and CEA were positively correlated with it (P<0.001, <0.001, 0.001, respectively) in all cases. Conclusions: Among pT1/2 breast cancer patients from eastern China islands, the LNR is a predictive prognosis factor; a higher LNR seems to correlate with a worse survival outcome both overall and in the subgroups. Strikingly, the current results reveal that serum FSH and LH level inversely associated with axillary node invasion in postmenopausal cases, whereas tumor markers directly related with it. The LNR is an informative factor complementing TNM staging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.