ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022
Differential Urinary Microbiota Composition Between Women With and Without Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterizing the role of the urobiome in the pathogenesis of recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs): a systematic review.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- The Urogenital Microbiome-Metabolic Interface in Postmenopausal Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection: Estrogen Deficiency, Diabetes, Obesity, and Microbial Reservoirs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Enhancement of Gut Microbial Homeostasis by a Post-NGPNutrients · 2026Article
- More than an infection: the ecological puzzle of recurrent urinary tract infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Revealing the potential value of urine microbiota in ureteral stent encrustation after renal transplantation via Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA genes.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Korean urobiome platform (KUROM) study for acute uncomplicated sporadic versus recurrent cystitis in women: Clinical significance.Investigative and clinical urology · 2024Article
- The Critical Role of Intracellular Bacterial Communities in Uncomplicated Recurrent Urinary Cystitis: A Comprehensive Review of Detection Methods and Diagnostic Potential.International neurourology journal · 2024Article
- Urinary Microbiome in Bladder Diseases-Review.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- 16S Ribosomal RNA Analysis for the Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection of Infants: Has the Time Arrived?Indian journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Current Viewpoint on Female Urogenital Microbiome-The Cause or the Consequence?Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Characterization of the GU microbiome in women with self-perceived bladder health over the life course.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recurrent urinary tract infection (RUTI) is common and burdensome in women. Due to the low concentration or slow-growing of uropathogens in RUTI, standard urine cultures (SUCs) are often negative. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of bacterial 16S rRNA gene is more sensitive and could be used to reveal the differential microbiota between patients with RUTI and asymptomatic controls. Methods: Women (aged ≥ 18 years) with clinically diagnosed RUTI with negative SUC and age-matched women asymptomatic controls with normal urinalysis were enrolled. Their midstream voided urine specimens were collected and processed for NGS (Illumina MiSeq) targeting the bacterial 16S rRNA gene V3-V4 region. The dataset was clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using QIIME. Taxonomic analysis, alpha diversity, beta diversity, multivariate statistical analysis, and linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) for differential analysis were performed and compared between patients with RUTI and asymptomatic controls. Results: A total of 90 patients with RUTI and 62 asymptomatic controls were enrolled in this study. Among them, 74.4% (67/90) and 71.0% (44/62) were successfully amplified and sequenced their bacterial 16S rRNA gene. In the alpha diversity analysis, the chao1 index and observed species index were significantly lower in the RUTI group than in the control group ( Conclusion: The urinary microbiota of women with clinically diagnosed RUTI were significantly different from age-matched asymptomatic controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.