Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35722301›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

CRISPR-Cas9 Targeting of the

Alessandra Lucioli, Raffaela Tavazza, Simona Baima, Karoly Fatyol, Jozsef Burgyan, Mario Tavazza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genome Editing in Root and Tuber Crop Development in Sub-Saharan Africa.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. From Lab to Field: CRISPRing Major CultivatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. CRISPR-Cas Gene Editing Technology in Potato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandra LucioliBiotechnology Laboratory, Biotechnology and Agroindustry Division, Department for Sustainability, ENEA, CR Casaccia, Rome, Italy.
Raffaela TavazzaBiotechnology Laboratory, Biotechnology and Agroindustry Division, Department for Sustainability, ENEA, CR Casaccia, Rome, Italy.
Simona BaimaResearch Centre for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Rome, Italy.
Karoly FatyolAgricultural Biotechnology Institute, National Agricultural Research and Innovation Centre, Godollo, Hungary.
Jozsef BurgyanAgricultural Biotechnology Institute, National Agricultural Research and Innovation Centre, Godollo, Hungary.
Mario TavazzaBiotechnology Laboratory, Biotechnology and Agroindustry Division, Department for Sustainability, ENEA, CR Casaccia, Rome, Italy.
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development · ITNational Agricultural Research and Innovation Centre · HUCereal Research Centre · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translation initiation factors and, in particular, the eIF4E family are the primary source of recessive resistance to potyviruses in many plant species. However, no eIF4E-mediated resistance to this virus genus has been identified in potato (

Indexed as

eIF4Egenome editingpotatopotyvirus resistancePVYtranslation initiation factors

Identifiers

PMID35722301
PMCPMC9198583
OpenAlexW4281794786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.