ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Cardioprotection of Repeated Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Impact of myocardial deformation on risk prediction in patients following acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on left ventricular function in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: The CONDI-2 echocardiographic sub-study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Repeated remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) after myocardial infarction (MI) has been shown to improve left ventricular (LV) remodeling in the experimental studies, but its cardioprotective effect in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is still unknown. Objective: To investigate whether repeated RIC started early after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can improve LV function in patients with STEMI. Methods: Patients with STEMI treated by primary PCI were included and randomized to the repeated RIC group ( Results: The repeated RIC group and the control group were well-matched at baseline including mean GLS (-9.8 ± 2.6% vs. -10.1 ± 2.5%, Conclusion: Daily repeated RIC started within 24 h after PCI can improve GLS and reduce plasma NT proBNP levels in patients with STEMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.