ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022
Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment, the Catalyst to Amplify the Effect of Maternal Infertility on Preterm Birth.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The risk of congenital malformations and neonatal outcomes among singletons and twins born after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-regression analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- Uterine electromyography as a new predictor of extremely preterm birth: a multifactorial model integrating clinical and bioelectrical parameters.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- A prediction model of preterm birth in singleton pregnancy after assisted reproduction therapy.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- The effect of in vitro fertilization on the cardiac health of mice.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Integrated multi-omics analysis identifies TLR4-mediated mechanisms in ATBC-induced ovarian dysfunction and female infertility: A network toxicology, transcriptomic, and Mendelian randomization study.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- L-carnitine combined with traditional Chinese medicine for male infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Reflections on appropriately liberalizing ART for groups requiring special attention in China.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- No improvement in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes with combined luteal support in modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Hypoxia-sensitive miRNA regulationFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify the influence of different infertility causes and assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment on perinatal outcomes and clarify the relationship between the maternal pathophysiological changes and artificial interventions. Methods: A total of 1,629 fertile women and 27,112 infertile women with sole infertility causes were prospectively recruited from July 2014 to December 2017, and 9,894 singletons were finally enrolled into the study. Pregnancies with more than one cause of infertility and/or multiple births were excluded. According to the causes of infertility and the exposure of ART treatment, the participants were divided into four groups, namely, fertile naturally conceived (NC) group, infertile NC group, female factor ART group, and male factor ART group. Perinatal outcomes, including gestational age of delivery (GA), birth weight (BW), preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), small for gestational age (SGA), and large for gestational age (LGA), were compared among groups. Logistic regression was performed for the adjustment of several covariates. Results: The birth outcomes of the infertile NC group and fertile NC group, female factor ART group, and infertile NC group were comparable. Compared to the fertile NC group, the female factor ART group had a shorter GA (39.0 ± 1.6 vs. 39.3 ± 1.5 weeks, BW: P < 0.05). An interaction test showed that ART treatment had an interaction on the effect of female infertility on GA (P = 0.023). The female factor ART group also had a higher risk of PTB (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.18-2.07) and LGA (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10-1.47) compared to the fertile NC group. The risk of PTB was increased for tubal factor ART (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.12-2.00), ovulatory dysfunction ART (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.29-2.72), and unexplained infertility ART (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.11-3.17). The risk of LGA was increased for tubal factor ART (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.11-1.48) and ovulatory dysfunction ART (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.03-1.57). Conclusions: Our findings indicated that ART treatment could amplify the adverse effect of female infertility on neonates. Women with tubal factor infertility, ovulatory dysfunction, and unexplained infertility have a higher risk of PTB after ART treatment. Thus, clinicians should be vigilant in such patients and provide corresponding prevention strategies before and during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.