Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35721737›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment, the Catalyst to Amplify the Effect of Maternal Infertility on Preterm Birth.

Youzhen Zhang, Wei Zhou, Wanbing Feng, Jingmei Hu, Kuona Hu, Linlin Cui, Zi-Jiang Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hypoxia-sensitive miRNA regulationFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Youzhen ZhangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Wei ZhouCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Wanbing FengCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jingmei HuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Kuona HuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Linlin CuiCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Zi-Jiang ChenCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Shandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To identify the influence of different infertility causes and assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment on perinatal outcomes and clarify the relationship between the maternal pathophysiological changes and artificial interventions. Methods: A total of 1,629 fertile women and 27,112 infertile women with sole infertility causes were prospectively recruited from July 2014 to December 2017, and 9,894 singletons were finally enrolled into the study. Pregnancies with more than one cause of infertility and/or multiple births were excluded. According to the causes of infertility and the exposure of ART treatment, the participants were divided into four groups, namely, fertile naturally conceived (NC) group, infertile NC group, female factor ART group, and male factor ART group. Perinatal outcomes, including gestational age of delivery (GA), birth weight (BW), preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), small for gestational age (SGA), and large for gestational age (LGA), were compared among groups. Logistic regression was performed for the adjustment of several covariates. Results: The birth outcomes of the infertile NC group and fertile NC group, female factor ART group, and infertile NC group were comparable. Compared to the fertile NC group, the female factor ART group had a shorter GA (39.0 ± 1.6 vs. 39.3 ± 1.5 weeks, BW: P < 0.05). An interaction test showed that ART treatment had an interaction on the effect of female infertility on GA (P = 0.023). The female factor ART group also had a higher risk of PTB (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.18-2.07) and LGA (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10-1.47) compared to the fertile NC group. The risk of PTB was increased for tubal factor ART (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.12-2.00), ovulatory dysfunction ART (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.29-2.72), and unexplained infertility ART (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.11-3.17). The risk of LGA was increased for tubal factor ART (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.11-1.48) and ovulatory dysfunction ART (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.03-1.57). Conclusions: Our findings indicated that ART treatment could amplify the adverse effect of female infertility on neonates. Women with tubal factor infertility, ovulatory dysfunction, and unexplained infertility have a higher risk of PTB after ART treatment. Thus, clinicians should be vigilant in such patients and provide corresponding prevention strategies before and during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Infertility, FemalePremature BirthBirth WeightFemaleHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeReproductive Techniques, Assistedassisted reproductive technologyinfertilityneonatal outcomeovulatory dysfunctionpreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID35721737
PMCPMC9200983
OpenAlexW4281673469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.