Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35721644›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2022

Nefopam prescribing preferences in French hospitals: results of a survey.

Thomas Schulz, Laure Lalande, Frederic Aubrun, Mikhail Dziadzko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nefopam Misuse: A Cross-Sectional Study in France.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025
    Observational
  2. Analgesic effect of intravenous nefopam for postoperative pain in spine surgery: a meta-analysis of RCTs.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas SchulzDépartement d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, F-69004 Lyon, France.
Laure LalandeService de Pharmacie, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, F-69004 Lyon, France.
Frederic AubrunDépartement d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, F-69004 Lyon, France.
Mikhail DziadzkoDépartement d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, F-69004 Lyon, France.
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: nefopam is a non-opioid, centrally-acting analgesic, frequently prescribed in France for acute pain and postoperatively. Only intravenous (IV) formulation is available, however the off-label oral use is frequent in surgical and medical patients. There is no data on the actual in-hospital prescription preferences in French physicians regarding nefopam. We wish to identify nefopam prescription habits for acute and chronic pain among hospital physicians. Methods: an online survey was sent to physicians via professional emails. Frequency of prescription, indication, preferred and prescribed administration route, dose regimen, and personal perception of the nefopam tolerance and efficiency were examined. Results: a total of 527 responses were analysed. Nefopam was mostly prescribed by senior hospital physicians, for acute pain, orally (85%), 20 mg/6h with 120 mg maximal daily dose. For chronic pain, the oral administration was more frequent. More than half of prescribers considered the efficacy of the oral route was similar to intravenous, and better tolerated compared to intravenous administration. Forty-eight percent of responders would change their prescription attitude in case of oral route approval of nefopam. Conclusion: oral prescription of intravenous formulation of nefopam is frequent, especially for acute pain, and has the same dose and regimen pattern as for intravenous route. Prescribers consider oral nefopam efficient and safe for patients. Regulatory actions regarding the oral nefopam prescription authorization and duration of such prescription are needed.

Indexed as

Acute PainAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticChronic PainNefopamHospitalsHumansPostoperative PainAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticNefopamHospital physiciansnefopamoff label useoral administrationprescribing patternregulationsurvey

Identifiers

PMID35721644
PMCPMC9167477
OpenAlexW4225680885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.