ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2022
[Knowledge of malaria and preventive attitudes of Tunisian travellers toward malaria endemic areas].
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: travellers to endemic areas must know malaria, its risk factors and prophylactic measures. This can help to avoid severe cases of malaria and to prevent transmission in countries that are malaria-free. The purpose of this study is to assess Tunisian travellers´ knowledge about malaria, its transmission and prevention and their adherence to prophylactic measures. Methods: we conducted a survey based on two anonymous questionnaires (pre- and post-trip) among adults travelling to endemic countries. The 1st questionnaire was followed by a medical interview focusing on level of risk and recommended prophylactic measures. Results: two hundred and eighty-nine travellers were recruited. They mainly moved within sub-Saharan Africa (99%) for professional reasons (84,4%). The average age of subjects was 42.3 years and sex ratio (male/female) was 3.1. Prior to departure, only 53.3% of subjects were aware of the risk of malaria, and only 28% gave correct answers about modes of transmission. Recommendations for chemoprophylaxis were only known by 62.3% of subjects and only 43.6% intended to use chemoprophylaxis (p < 0.01). Better adherence to protective measures, including chemoprophylaxis, was reported after the trip, with attitudes qualified as good or excellent by 64.2% on return against 23.7% before the interview (<0.001). Conclusion: Tunisian travellers knowledge of malaria is insufficient. Strengthening information through specialized consultations (whose usefulness has been demonstrated) is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.