ArticleJCO precision oncology2022
Longitudinal Shifts of Solid Tumor and Liquid Biopsy Sequencing Concordance in Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Article in JCO precision oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebrospinal fluid circulating tumor DNA profiling in central nervous system metastases from solid tumors: A prospective multicentre translational analysis of the BrainStorm (OncoDistinct-006) study.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
- Off-Target-Based Tumor Fraction Estimation from Targeted Sequencing Shows Concordance with Orthogonal Methods Across Advanced Solid Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Biological basis and clinical translation prospects of circulating cell-free DNA in precision management of breast cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Expert recommendations for PIK3CA testing in HR+/HER2- locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Sequencing of Intraoperatively Acquired Cerebrospinal Fluid and Matched Tumor Tissue in Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection for Glioblastoma.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- Retrospective comparison between breast cancer tissue- and blood-based next-generation sequencing results in detection of PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN alterations.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Clinical applications of next-generation sequencing-based ctDNA analyses in breast cancer: defining treatment targets and dynamic changes during disease progression.Molecular oncology · 2025Review
- Deciphering Breast Tumor Heterogeneity Through Patient-Derived Organoids and Circulating Tumor Cells.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Minimum Technical Preanalytical, Patient, and Clinical Context Data Elements for Cerebrospinal Fluid Liquid Biopsy: Recommendations for Public Database Submissions.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- From Local to Systemic: The Journey of Tick Bite Biomarkers in Australian Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Circulating tumor DNA predicts venous thromboembolism in patients with cancers.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2025Article
- Circulating DNA tumor fraction as a biomarker for advanced breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Frequency of Common and UncommonCancers · 2024Article
- Primary refractory plasmablastic lymphoma: A precision oncology approach.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Recent Advances in Blood-Based Liquid Biopsy Approaches in Prostate Cancer.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) is limited by the inability to noninvasively track tumor evolution. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) NGS has made sequential testing feasible; however, the relationship between cfDNA and tissue-based testing in mBC is not well understood. Here, we evaluate concordance between tissue and cfDNA NGS relative to cfDNA sampling frequency in a large, clinically annotated mBC data set.
methodsTempus LENS was used to analyze deidentified records of mBC cases with Tempus xT (tissue) and xF (cfDNA) sequencing results. Then, various metrics of concordance were assessed within overlapping probe regions of the tissue and cfDNA assays (104 genes), focusing on pathogenic variants. Variant allele frequencies of discordant and concordant pathogenic variants were also compared. Analyses were stratified by mBC subtype and time between tests.
resultsRecords from 300 paired tissue and liquid biopsies were analyzed. Median time between tissue and blood collection was 78.5 days (standard deviation = 642.99). The median number of pathogenic variants/patient was one for cfDNA and two for tissue. Across the cohort, 77.8% of pathogenic tissue variants were found in cfDNA and 75.7% of pathogenic cfDNA variants were found in tissue when tests were ≤ 7 days apart, which decreased to 50.3% and 51.8%, respectively, for > 365 days. Furthermore, the median patient-level variant concordance was 67% when tests were ≤7 days apart and 30%-37% when > 30 days. The median variant allele frequencies of discordant variants were generally lower than those of concordant variants within the same time frame.
conclusionWe observed high concordances between tissue and cfDNA results that generally decreased with longer durations between tests. Thus, cfDNA NGS reliably measures tissue genomics and is likely beneficial for longitudinal monitoring of molecular changes in mBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.