ArticleFrontiers in physiology2022
Can the 20 and 60 s All-Out Test Predict the 2000 m Indoor Rowing Performance in Athletes?
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tier-specific physiological profiling in male rowers: insights from an integrated three-phase performance diagnostic framework.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Predicting 2,000-meter rowing ergometer performance with 7-stroke peak power, 20-Second, and 60-Second maximal effort tests in NCAA DI female rowers.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- The Evaluation of Physical Performance in Rowing Ergometer: A Systematic Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Review
- Ageing, clinical complexity, and exercise therapy: a multidimensional approach.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Review
- The Kinematics of Fixed-Seat Rowing: A Structured Synthesis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- On the Kinematics of the Forward-Facing Venetian-Style Rowing Technique.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.