Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35721312›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2022

Study Protocol of tDCS Based Pain Modulation in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Under Chemoradiation Therapy Condition: An fNIRS-EEG Study.

Brenda de Souza Moura, Xiao-Su Hu, Marcos F DosSantos, Alexandre F DaSilva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Brenda de Souza MouraHeadache & Orofacial Pain Effort (H.O.P.E.), Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Xiao-Su HuHeadache & Orofacial Pain Effort (H.O.P.E.), Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Marcos F DosSantosLaboratório de Propriedades Mecânicas e Biologia Celular (PropBio), Departamento de Prótese e Materiais Dentários, Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Alexandre F DaSilvaHeadache & Orofacial Pain Effort (H.O.P.E.), Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiple therapeutic strategies have been adopted to reduce pain, odynophagia, and oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients. Among them, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) represents a unique analgesic modality. However, the details of tDCS mechanisms in pain treatment are still unclear. Aims: (1) to study the analgesic effects of a protocol that encompassed supervised-remote and in-clinic tDCS sessions applied in head and neck patients undergoing chemoradiation therapy; (2) to explore the underlining brain mechanisms of such modulation process, using a novel protocol that combined functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), and electroencephalograph (EEG), two distinct neuroimaging methods that bring information regarding changes in the hemodynamic as well as in the electrical activity of the brain, respectively. Methods: This proof-of-concept study was performed on two subjects. The study protocol included a 7-week-long tDCS stimulation procedure, a pre-tDCS baseline session, and two post-tDCS follow-up sessions. Two types of tDCS devices were used. One was used in the clinical setting and the other remotely. Brain imaging was obtained in weeks 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, and after 1 month. Results: The protocol implemented was safe and reliable. Preliminary results of the fNIRS analysis in weeks 2 and 7 showed a decrease in functional connections between the bilateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the primary sensory cortex (S1) ( Conclusion: The protocol combining remote and in-clinic administered tDCS and integrated fNIRS and EEG to evaluate the brain activity is feasible. The preliminary results suggest that the mechanisms of tDCS in reducing the pain of head and neck cancer patients may be related to its effects on the connections between the S1 and the PFC.

Indexed as

chemoradiotherapyelectroencephalographfunctional near-infrared spectroscopyhead and neck cancertranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35721312
PMCPMC9200064
OpenAlexW4281707829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.