ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2022
Mass Spectrometry Imaging as a New Method: To Reveal the Pathogenesis and the Mechanism of Traditional Medicine in Cerebral Ischemia.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Hydrogen as a Regulator of Mitochondrial Quality Control and Metabolic Reprogramming.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Multimodal landscape of atherosclerotic plaques: A spatial omics approach with mass spectrometry imaging.Analytica chimica acta · 2025Review
- Ferroptosis and Metabolic Dysregulation: Emerging Chemical Targets in Cancer and Infection.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Spatial metabolomics in mental disorders and traditional Chinese medicine: a review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Comprehensive spatial distribution profiling of bioactive emodin in mouse organs using mass spectrometry imaging.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2024Article
- Lipid Changes in the Peri-Implantation Period with Mass Spectrometry Imaging: A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) can describe the spatial distribution of molecules in various complex biological samples, such as metabolites, lipids, peptides and proteins in a comprehensive way, and can provide highly relevant supplementary information when combined with other molecular imaging techniques and chromatography techniques, so it has been used more and more widely in biomedical research. The application of mass spectrometry imaging in neuroscience is developing. It is very advantageous and necessary to use MSI to study various pathophysiological processes involved in brain injury and functional recovery during cerebral ischemia. Therefore, this paper introduces the techniques of mass spectrometry, including the principle of mass spectrometry, the acquisition and preparation of imaging samples, the commonly used ionization techniques, and the optimization of the current applied methodology. Furthermore, the research on the mechanism of cerebral ischemia by mass spectrometry was reviewed, such as phosphatidylcholine involved, dopamine, spatial distribution and level changes of physiological substances such as ATP in the Krebs cycle; The characteristics of mass spectrometry imaging as one of the methods of metabolomics in screening biomarkers related to cerebral ischemia were analyzed the advantages of MSI in revealing drug distribution and the mechanism of traditional drugs were summarized, and the existing problems of MSI were also analyzed and relevant suggestions were put forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.