ArticleMedicine and pharmacy reports2022
Causes of revision after total hip arthroplasty in an orthopedics and traumatology regional center.
Article in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Prosthesis Survival After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Women with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Narrative Review of Instability, Revision Risk, and Reproductive Health Considerations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Association of Testosterone Supplementation with the Risk of Infection following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.Hip & pelvis · 2025Article
- Article
- Effect of segmental rim defect morphology on press-fit stability of the cementless acetabular cup: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Dual Mobility in Extreme Situations of Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Series of 3 Cases and Review of Literature.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2024Article
- Systematisation of the causes that required revision hip replacement, methods of their solution, treatment results in Ukraine.BMC surgery · 2024Article
- Review
- Mid-Term Migration Pattern of a Cemented Collared Anatomical Stem-A Retrospective Study Using EBRA-FCA.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of femoral bone loss: uncemented vs. cemented aseptic stem loosening in first-time revision surgery-a retrospective evaluation of 215 patients.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Total hip arthroplasty for fractured neck of femur does not restore preoperative hip-specific function, health-related quality of life, or level of fitness.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- Article
- The invasiveness of robot-assisted total hip replacement is similar to that of conventional surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Acetabular Revision with McMinn Cup: Development and Application of a Patient-Specific Targeting Device.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of mortality rate and septic and aseptic revisions in total hip arthroplasties for osteoarthritis and femoral neck fracture: an analysis of the German Arthroplasty Registry.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023Article
- Autologous Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell Driving Bone Regeneration in a Rabbit Model of Femoral Head Osteonecrosis.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Effect of digital navigation during anterior-approach total hip arthroplasty on patient outcomes.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Despite the great success of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), the number of revisions has significantly increased over the past years. The objectives of the study were to investigate the main causes that lead to revision of THA, the time interval between primary THA and revision, and the results of the revision surgery. We also assessed whether there was any correlation between the patients' age, BMI, diagnosis for primary THA and the cause of failure. Methods: This paper retrospectively analyzed 189 patients with THA revision surgery performed over a six-year period, between 2015 and 2020. Patients' charts were reviewed to collect data on patient's demographics, patient's primary THA and revision procedures, and the time interval between primary THA and revision surgery. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the time interval THA-revision: group I (<5 years), group II (5-10 years) and group III (>10 years). Results: The patients' mean age (82 men/107 women) was 69.59±7.85 years (range 31-92 years). The most frequent revision cause was aseptic loosening (52%), followed by periprosthetic fractures (18%), infection (17%) and persistent hip instability (12%). Patients' age (r=0.43) and BMI (r=-0.4) had low correlation with the time interval between THA and revision. Conclusions: The main causes for revision THA within less than five years are infection and instability, while revision for aseptic loosening is performed especially after five years from the primary THA. Osteonecrosis, post-traumatic osteoarthritis and femoral neck fracture are correlated with a higher incidence of revision at less than five years from the primary THA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.