Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35720975›Full record

ArticleCell genomics2022

Representing sex chromosomes in genome assemblies.

Sarah B Carey, John T Lovell, Jerry Jenkins, Jim Leebens-Mack, Jeremy Schmutz, Melissa A Wilson, Alex Harkess

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An X-linked sex determination mechanism in cannabis and hop.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evidence for a Novel X Chromosome in Termites.Genome biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah B CareyDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
John T LovellHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA.
Jerry JenkinsHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA.
Jim Leebens-MackDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Jeremy SchmutzHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA.
Melissa A WilsonSchool of Life Sciences, Center for Evolution and Medicine, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Alex HarkessDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology · USArizona State University · USAuburn University · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

Population dynamics and medical consequences of sex chromosome evolutionR35GM124827 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI WILSON, MELISSA A · 2017 to 2024
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM124827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex chromosomes have evolved hundreds of independent times across eukaryotes. As genome sequencing, assembly, and scaffolding techniques rapidly improve, it is now feasible to build fully phased sex chromosome assemblies. Despite technological advances enabling phased assembly of whole chromosomes, there are currently no standards for representing sex chromosomes when publicly releasing a genome. Furthermore, most computational analysis tools are unable to efficiently investigate their unique biology relative to autosomes. We discuss a diversity of sex chromosome systems and consider the challenges of representing sex chromosome pairs in genome assemblies. By addressing these issues now as technologies for full phasing of chromosomal assemblies are maturing, we can collectively ensure that future genome analysis toolkits can be broadly applied to all eukaryotes with diverse types of sex chromosome systems. Here we provide best practice guidelines for presenting a genome assembly that contains sex chromosomes. These guidelines can also be applied to other non-recombining genomic regions, such as S-loci in plants and mating-type loci in fungi and algae.

Identifiers

PMID35720975
PMCPMC9205529
OpenAlexW4225384823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.