ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Prediction for Distant Metastasis of Breast Cancer Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Images under Deep Learning.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical applications of MRI-based artificial intelligence in spinal metastases: A systematic review.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Review
- Construction of Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease diagnostic model and identification of biomarkers based on a multi-omics integration strategy of machine learning.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence assisted multi-model pathological diagnosis of breast cancer based on multispectral autofluorescence images.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- MRI-Based Radiomics Model for Classifying Axillary Lymph Node Burden and Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Radiomics and Deep Learning: Bridging Breast Cancer Imaging Phenotypes and Genomic Heterogeneity.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
- Exploring the recurrence and metastasis of breast invasive ductal carcinoma based on machine learning and survival analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- SEER-based machine learning prediction of bone metastasis in breast cancer: model development and validation.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of distant metastasis risk in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.PloS one · 2025Article
- Development and validation of AI models using LR and LightGBM for predicting distant metastasis in breast cancer: a dual-center study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Predicting diagnosis and survival of bone metastasis in breast cancer using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- How has the field of metastatic breast cancer in bones evolved over the past 22 years?Journal of bone oncology · 2023Article
- How neighborhood environment modified the effects of power outages on multiple health outcomes in New York state?Hygiene and environmental health advances · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research aimed to explore the effect of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic features to establish a model for predicting distant metastasis under dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI imaging with deep learning algorithms. The deep learning algorithm was used to segment the images. A total of 96 cases with 100 lesions were included in the metastatic group, including 2 cases of bifocal breast cancer and 2 cases of multifocal breast cancer. There were 192 cases in the nonmetastatic group, with 197 lesions, including 5 cases of multifocal breast cancer. After dynamic contrast-enhancement, the morphological features and grayscale statistical features were extracted from the lesions to establish a prediction model through sum-sum check and feature dimension reduction. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of prediction models based only on imaging features were compared with those created by combining radiomic features with clinical and pathological features. The created predictive model based on radiomic features for distant metastases in breast cancer showed a sensitivity of 66.7%, a specificity of 84.2%, an accuracy of 78.3%, and an AUC of 0.744. The sensitivity of the prediction model for distant metastasis of breast cancer was 67.7%, the specificity was 86.8%, the accuracy was 80.5%, and the AUC was 0.763. Bone, lung, and liver were the most common distant metastatic sites of breast cancer. Under the dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of deep learning, the prediction model combining radiomic features with clinical and pathological features showed better predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.