ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Improving Adherence to AAP Acute Otitis Media Guidelines in an Academic Pediatrics Practice through a Quality Improvement Project.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions to Minimize Unnecessary Antibiotic Use for Acute Otitis Media: A Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Next Steps in Ambulatory Stewardship.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2023Review
- Glucagon fill rates and cost among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in the United States, 2011-2021.Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2023Article
- Reliability of nasopharyngeal PCR for the detection of otopathogens in children with uncomplicated acute otitis media compared to culture.Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2023Article
- New insights into the treatment of acute otitis media.Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2023Review
- Improving Prescribing for Otitis Media in a Pediatric Emergency Unit: A Quality Improvement Initiative.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
- Improving Guideline-concordant Antibiotic Use for Acute Otitis Media in a Pediatric Primary Care Network.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acute otitis media (AOM) is the most common reason for antibiotic use in children. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) published its latest AOM guidelines in 2013. A safety-net antibiotic prescription (SNAP) is recommended for some patients based on age, severity, and duration of symptoms. At baseline, 78% of patients diagnosed with AOM in our general pediatrics practice met AAP guidelines, and 20% of eligible patients received a SNAP according to guidelines. We aimed to increase adherence to AAP AOM guidelines in an academic general pediatrics clinic from 78% to 90% by January 2020. Methods: A quality improvement team determined key drivers and developed interventions. Patients included were 6 months to 12 years old with AOM. Encounters were reviewed for adherence to AAP AOM guidelines. During the project, interventions included an ear pain note template, which generated guideline-based recommendations, note template education in clinic orientation sessions, a didactic session on AOM management, and reminders on workstations. Data were analyzed using P-charts. Results: Percent of AOM encounters (n = 1266) adhering to AAP AOM guidelines increased from 78% to 92%. We also reviewed two process measures. First, the use of the ear pain note template increased from 0% to 44%. Second, the percent of AOM encounters where an eligible patient received a SNAP increased from 21% to 78% (encounters n = 421). Conclusion: We demonstrate increased adherence to AAP AOM guidelines, including improved use of SNAPs after introducing a note template with clinical decision support and provider educational sessions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.