ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD
Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of bioceramic and epoxy sealers after using various final irrigants: An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Push-out bond strength evaluation of endodontic bioceramic sealer (Bioroot RCS) after final irrigation with different intracanal irrigants: A comparative in vitro study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Influence of irrigating solutions on the hydration of calcium silicate-based dental biomaterials: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Could the sealer thickness affect the filling ability of bioceramic endodontic materials? Evaluation in a simulated physiological condition.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Randomised Clinical Trial: Effect of AH Plus and Neosealer Flo on Postoperative Pain and Healing of Periapical Lesions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of the inflammatory response of human gingival fibroblasts to NeoSEALER Flo and CeraSeal bioceramic sealers: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Effect of Irrigation Solution Temperature on Bioceramic Sealer Bond Strength.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Effects of heating on bioceramic sealers: a scoping review of chemo-physical properties and clinical implications.Odontology · 2025Article
- Push-out bond strength for bioceramic and epoxy resin-based sealers.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the antibacterial and cytotoxic properties of TotalFill and NeoSEALER flo bioceramic sealers.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Article
- AnBioinformation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The aim of the study is to compare the push-out bond strength of bioceramic and epoxy sealers after using various final irrigants. Materials and Methods: Hundred single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups ( Statistical Analysis: The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and independent Student's Results: Both the sealers exhibited higher push-out bond strength after treatment with GA with no significant difference between 5% and 17% GA. Bio C sealer with GA as final irrigant showed higher bond strength than Dia-Proseal ( Conclusion: The push-out bond strength of the sealer was significantly affected by the final irrigation solution used. The highest push-out bond strength was seen with Bio C sealer after treatment with GA with no significant difference between 5% and 17% GA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.