Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35720815›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD

Toxicity of bioceramic and resinous endodontic sealers using an alternative animal model:

Cristiana Pereira Malta, Raquel Cristine Silva Barcelos, Hecson Jesser Segat, Marilise Escobar Burger, Carlos Alexandre Souza Bier, Renata Dornelles Morgental

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Peptides in Dentistry: A Scoping Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Potential effects of noni (Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cristiana Pereira MaltaDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Raquel Cristine Silva BarcelosDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Hecson Jesser SegatDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Marilise Escobar BurgerDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Carlos Alexandre Souza BierDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Renata Dornelles MorgentalDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The present study assessed the toxicity of a novel calcium silicate-based root canal sealer (Bio-C Sealer) in comparison to Endosequence BC Sealer and AH Plus through a lethality assay involving brine shrimp ( Methods: Brine shrimp cysts were incubated for 24 h for the hatching of the larvae, which were then exposed to different concentrations (2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 100 μg/mL) of the test endodontic sealers for 24 h, followed by the determination of the survival rate. Statistical Analysis Used: One-way repeated-measures ANOVA and the Newman-Keuls Results: The toxicity of Bio-C (10, 20, 40, 80, and 100 μg/mL) and Endosequence BC Sealer (20, 80, and 100 μg/mL) was lower than that of AH Plus. No significant difference was found between Bio-C and Endosequence BC Sealer or among the different intragroup concentrations of these sealers. In the AH Plus group, concentrations ≥5.0 μg/mL exhibited greater toxicity compared to the concentration of 2.5 μg/mL and the control. AH Plus had the lowest LC50 (59.95 μg/mL), whereas Bio-C and Endosequence BC Sealer had LC50 values >200 μg/mL. Conclusions: Bio-C Sealer proved to be less toxic than AH Plus and exhibited similar toxicity to that of Endosequence BC Sealer.

Indexed as

Artemiaendodonticsroot canal obturationtoxicity tests

Identifiers

PMID35720815
PMCPMC9205353
OpenAlexW4283218942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.