Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35720813›Full record

ReviewJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD

Recommended clinical practice guidelines of aesthetic dentistry for Indians: An expert consensus.

Dibyendu Majumder, Mithra N Hegde, Shishir Singh, Ashu Gupta, Shashi Rashmi Acharya, P Karunakar, R S Mohan Kumar, B Mrinalini, Shazeena Qaiser, Urvashi Bhimjibhai Sodvadia and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dibyendu MajumderPresident, Dental Council of India, Mangalore, India.
Mithra N HegdeA.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, India.
Shishir SinghDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Terna Dental College, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Ashu GuptaDepartment and Principal, HP Government Dental College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Shashi Rashmi AcharyaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
P KarunakarDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Panineeya Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
R S Mohan KumarDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Priyadarshini Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
B MrinaliniDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Affiliated to Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Mangalore, India.
Shazeena QaiserDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Urvashi Bhimjibhai SodvadiaPrivate Practitioner, Dental Speciality Clinic, Surat, Gujarat, India.
Honap Manjiri NageshDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Inderprastha Dental College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The research for analyzing the smile characteristics in the Indian population has been limited with contradictory outcomes. This consensus statement aims to critically review the literature and provide basic practice guidelines on dental aesthetics related to the Indian population. Clinical Considerations: 9 clinicians and 6 resource persons from dental colleges in India collaborated in this consensus statement which covered 6 topics along with 6 introductory and 6 conclusive remarks. The statement was developed through a colloquium conducted on topics; global aesthetics: different smile design proportions and guidelines, patient perspective towards aesthetic dentistry in India, a literature survey of aesthetic dentistry for the Indian population, macro and micro-aesthetics, multidisciplinary approach in aesthetic dentistry, inclusion of high-end technologies in Indian modern-day practice, followed by a panel discussion to devise and establish the practice guidelines of aesthetic dentistry in India. The Consensus Statement has been formulated according to AGREE Reporting checklist. Conclusion: The experts and panelists reached a Consensus on protocols to institute clinical practice guidelines of aesthetic dentistry for Indians. However, based on all available literature from India, further research is required to investigate many questions that have not been previously considered.

Indexed as

Clinical practice guidelinesesthetic dentistryesthetic principlesIndiansmacro-estheticmicro-estheticspatient perspective

Identifiers

PMID35720813
PMCPMC9205356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.