Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35720741›Full record

ArticleTelemedicine reports2021

Examining the Feasibility of Smart Blood Pressure Home Monitoring: Advancing Remote Prenatal Care in Rural Appalachia.

Jennifer D Runkle, Maggie M Sugg, Sena McCrory, Carol C Coulson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Telemedicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Rural maternal health interventions: A scoping review and implications for best practices.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer D RunkleNorth Carolina Institute for Climate Studies, North Carolina State University, Asheville, North Carolina, USA.
Maggie M SuggDepartment of Geography and Planning, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina, USA.
Sena McCroryNorth Carolina Institute for Climate Studies, North Carolina State University, Asheville, North Carolina, USA.
Carol C CoulsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mountain Area Health Education Center, Asheville, North Carolina, USA.
Appalachian State University · USMountain Area Health Education Center · USNorth Carolina State University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Asheville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a leading cause of U.S. maternal morbidity and mortality. Home blood pressure (BP) monitoring can provide early detection of hypertension (HTN) outside of routine prenatal visits. Yet little is understood about how well self-monitored BP performs during pregnancy, particularly in rural America. Objective: To examine the feasibility and patient adherence to a self-monitoring BP program and to remotely collect data on pregnant women during the third trimester at a rural health clinic. Materials and Methods: A repeated-measures prospective design was used to remotely monitor home BP readings. We examined retention and persistence of weekly BP monitoring in late-stage pregnancy, differences between weekly self-monitored and clinic BP measures, the performance of self-monitored BP in early detection of pregnancy-induced HTN, and receptivity to technology-enabled prenatal monitoring. Results: A total of 30 women enrolled. Women reported high satisfaction with prenatal care, but missed 5 out of 13 clinic visits (54%). Women contributed an average of 31.2 days of home BP monitoring. Findings showed that home systolic and diastolic BP readings slightly varied from clinic readings. Women reported high health-related internet use and e-health literacy. Participants (93%, Conclusion: Findings from this study can be used to inform a novel remote monitoring protocol to improve pregnancy care in a rural care setting.

Indexed as

blood pressuremobile healthpregnancyremote monitoringrural

Identifiers

PMID35720741
PMCPMC9049804
OpenAlexW3138837089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.