Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35720725›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Inference of Upcoming Human Grasp Using EMG During Reach-to-Grasp Movement.

Mo Han, Mehrshad Zandigohar, Sezen Yağmur Günay, Gunar Schirner, Deniz Erdoğmuş

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mo HanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.
Mehrshad ZandigoharDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.
Sezen Yağmur GünayDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.
Gunar SchirnerDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.
Deniz ErdoğmuşDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.
Northeastern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electromyography (EMG) data has been extensively adopted as an intuitive interface for instructing human-robot collaboration. A major challenge to the real-time detection of human grasp intent is the identification of dynamic EMG from hand movements. Previous studies predominantly implemented the steady-state EMG classification with a small number of grasp patterns in dynamic situations, which are insufficient to generate differentiated control regarding the variation of muscular activity in practice. In order to better detect dynamic movements, more EMG variability could be integrated into the model. However, only limited research was conducted on such detection of dynamic grasp motions, and most existing assessments on non-static EMG classification either require supervised ground-truth timestamps of the movement status or only contain limited kinematic variations. In this study, we propose a framework for classifying dynamic EMG signals into gestures and examine the impact of different movement phases, using an unsupervised method to segment and label the action transitions. We collected and utilized data from large gesture vocabularies with multiple dynamic actions to encode the transitions from one grasp intent to another based on natural sequences of human grasp movements. The classifier for identifying the gesture label was constructed afterward based on the dynamic EMG signal, with no supervised annotation of kinematic movements required. Finally, we evaluated the performances of several training strategies using EMG data from different movement phases and explored the information revealed from each phase. All experiments were evaluated in a real-time style with the performance transitions presented over time.

Indexed as

dynamic EMGelectromyography (EMG) signalsgesture classificationhuman intent inferencemachine learning

Identifiers

PMID35720725
PMCPMC9204158
OpenAlexW4281780784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.