ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
Local Extraction of Extra-Axial CSF from structural MRI.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- IcoConv : Explainable brain cortical surface analysis for ASD classification.Shape in medical imaging : International Workshop, ShapeMI 2023, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 8, 2023, Proceedings. ShapeMI (Workshop) (2023 : Vancouver, B.C.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The quantification of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), specifically the extra-axial cerebrospinal fluid (EA-CSF), which is the CSF in the subarachnoid space surrounding the cortical surface of the brain, has recently been shown to play an important role in the neuropathology of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in infants. While prior work addressed measuring the global volume of EA-CSF, there was no available tool that quantifies the local, anatomical distribution of the EA-CSF. A localized EA-CSF quantification would provide more accurate and interpretable measurements. In our recent work, we proposed such a local EA-CSF extraction by using a pipeline that combines probabilistic brain tissue segmentation, cortical surface reconstruction and streamline-based local EA-CSF quantification. Yet, that system had several shortcomings, in particular a lack of available software tools, as well as a quantification where EA-CSF portions are counted multiple times. The purpose of this article is to present a novel, graphical user interface based, publicly available software tool, called LocalEACSF, which allows the user to easily run an adapted version of this pipeline and provide a set of straightforward quality control visualizations to assess the quality of the EA-CSF quantification. This tool further adds improvements and optimizations to the prior assessment. The LocalEACSF tool allows neuroimaging labs to compute a local extraction of extra-axial CSF in their neuroimaging studies in order to investigate its role in normal and atypical brain development, without the need for extensive technical knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.