Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35720666›Full record

ArticleJBMR plus2022

Target Values and Daytime Variation of Bone Turnover Markers in Monitoring Osteoporosis Treatment After Fractures.

Tove T Borgen, Lene B Solberg, Trine Lauritzen, Ellen M Apalset, Åshild Bjørnerem, Erik F Eriksen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JBMR plus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Possible role of bone turnover markers in the diagnosis of adult hypophosphatasia.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bone loss induced by cancer treatments in breast and prostate cancer patients.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tove T BorgenDepartment of Rheumatology Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen Hospital Drammen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5012-0903
Lene B SolbergDivision of Orthopedic Surgery Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Trine LauritzenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen Hospital Drammen Norway.
Ellen M ApalsetBergen Group of Epidemiology and Biomarkers in Rheumatic Disease, Department of Rheumatology Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway.
Åshild BjørneremDepartment of Clinical Medicine UiT - The Arctic University of Norway Tromsø Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3123-2950
Erik F EriksenDepartment of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NODrammen Hospital · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The serum bone turnover markers (BTM) procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX) are recommended for monitoring adherence and response of antiresorptive drugs (ARD). BTM are elevated about 1 year after fracture and therefore BTM target values are most convenient in ARD treatment follow-up of fracture patients. In this prospective cohort study, we explored the cut-off values of P1NP and CTX showing the best discriminating ability with respect to adherence and treatment effects, reflected in bone mineral density (BMD) changes. Furthermore, we explored the ability of BTM to predict subsequent fractures and BTM variation during daytime in patients using ARD or not. After a fragility fracture, 228 consenting patients (82.2% women) were evaluated for ARD indication and followed for a mean of 4.6 years (SD 0.5 years). BMD was measured at baseline and after 2 years. Serum BTM were measured after 1 or 2 years. The largest area under the curve (AUC) for discrimination of patients taking ARD or not was shown for P1NP <30 μg/L and CTX <0.25 μg/L. AUC for discrimination of patients with >2% gain in BMD (lumbar spine and total hip) was largest at cut-off values for P1NP <30 μg/L and CTX <0.25 μg/L. Higher P1NP was associated with increased fracture risk in patients using ARD (hazard ratio [HR]

Indexed as

ANTIRESORPTIVESBIOCHEMICAL MARKERS OF BONE TURNOVERDXAFRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENTOSTEOPOROSIS

Identifiers

PMID35720666
PMCPMC9189911
OpenAlexW4224231890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.