Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35720600›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Detection of Anomalous Grapevine Berries Using Variational Autoencoders.

Miro Miranda, Laura Zabawa, Anna Kicherer, Laurenz Strothmann, Uwe Rascher, Ribana Roscher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miro MirandaRemote Sensing Group, Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Laura ZabawaInstitute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Professorship of Geodesy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Anna KichererJulius Kühn-Institut, Institute for Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof, Geilweilerhof, Germany.
Laurenz StrothmannInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences IBG-2, Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Uwe RascherInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences IBG-2, Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Ribana RoscherRemote Sensing Group, Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grapevine is one of the economically most important quality crops. The monitoring of the plant performance during the growth period is, therefore, important to ensure a high quality end-product. This includes the observation, detection, and respective reduction of unhealthy berries (physically damaged, or diseased). At harvest, it is not necessary to know the exact cause of the damage, but rather if the damage is apparent or not. Since a manual screening and selection before harvest is time-consuming and expensive, we propose an automatic, image-based machine learning approach, which can lead observers directly to anomalous areas without the need to monitor every plant manually. Specifically, we train a fully convolutional variational autoencoder with a feature perceptual loss on images with healthy berries only and consider image areas with deviations from this model as damaged berries. We use heatmaps which visualize the results of the trained neural network and, therefore, support the decision making for farmers. We compare our method against a convolutional autoencoder that was successfully applied to a similar task and show that our approach outperforms it.

Indexed as

anomaly detectionautoencoderdeep learningdisease detectionviticulture

Identifiers

PMID35720600
PMCPMC9198582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.