Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35720547›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Response of Physiological, Reproductive Function and Yield Traits in Cultivated Chickpea (

Poonam Devi, Uday Chand Jha, Vijay Prakash, Sanjeev Kumar, Swarup Kumar Parida, Pronob J Paul, P V Vara Prasad, Kamal Dev Sharma, Kadambot H M Siddique, Harsh Nayyar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Chickpea (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Assessing the heat sensitivity of Urdbean (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Poonam DeviDepartment of Botany, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.
Uday Chand JhaICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India.
Vijay PrakashAgricultural Research Station (S.K.R.A.U, Bikaner), Sri Ganganagar, India.
Sanjeev KumarDepartment of Plant Sciences, Central University of Punjab, Bhatinda, India.
Swarup Kumar ParidaNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Pronob J PaulInternational Rice Research Institute South-Asia Hub, Hyderabad, India.
P V Vara PrasadSustainable Intensification Innovation Lab, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Kamal Dev SharmaDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, India.
Kadambot H M SiddiqueThe UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Harsh NayyarDepartment of Botany, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under global climate change, high-temperature stress is becoming a major threat to crop yields, adversely affecting plant growth, and ultimately resulting in significant yield losses in various crops, including chickpea. Thus, identifying crop genotypes with increased heat stress (HS) tolerance is becoming a priority for chickpea research. Here, we assessed the response of seven physiological traits and four yield and yield-related traits in 39 chickpea genotypes grown in normal-sown and late-sown environments [to expose plants to HS (>32/20°C) at the reproductive stage] for two consecutive years (2017-2018 and 2018-2019). Significant genetic variability for the tested traits occurred under normal and HS conditions in both years. Based on the tested physiological parameters and yield-related traits, GNG2171, GNG1969, GNG1488, PantG186, CSJ515, RSG888, RSG945, RVG202, and GNG469 were identified as promising genotypes under HS. Further, ten heat-tolerant and ten heat-sensitive lines from the set of 39 genotypes were validated for their heat tolerance (32/20°C from flowering to maturity) in a controlled environment of a growth chamber. Of the ten heat-tolerant genotypes, GNG1969, GNG1488, PantG186, RSG888, CSJ315, and GNG1499 exhibited high heat tolerance evidenced by small reductions in pollen viability, pollen germination, and pod set %, high seed yield plant

Indexed as

chickpeaclimate resiliencegenotypeheat stressphysiological trait

Identifiers

PMID35720547
PMCPMC9202580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.