Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35720454›Full record

ArticleTelemedicine reports2022

Stroke Telemedicine for Arizona Rural Residents, the Legacy Telestroke Study.

Bart M Demaerschalk, Maria I Aguilar, Timothy J Ingall, David W Dodick, Bert B Vargas, Dwight D Channer, Erica L Boyd, Terri E J Kiernan, Dennis G Fitz-Patrick, J Gregory Collins and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Telemedicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00829361 (Stroke Telemedicine for Arizona Rural Residents Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00829361 nacompletednot on this map

Stroke Telemedicine for Arizona Rural Residents Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2008 to 2012Enrolled447ConditionsStroke, Cerebral Infarction, Vascular Diseases, Brain IschemiaArmsTelemedicine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Telemedical stroke care significantly improves patient outcome in rural areas: Long-term analysis of the German NEVAS network.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Bart M DemaerschalkDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7262-817X
Maria I AguilarNeuro Hospitalist and Stroke Program, Penrose/St Francis, Centura Health, Colroado Springs, Colorado, USA.
Timothy J IngallDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
David W DodickDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Bert B VargasDepartment of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics at University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Dwight D ChannerDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Erica L BoydDepartment of Research, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Terri E J KiernanComprehensive Stroke Program, St. Anthony's Hospital, Lakewood, Colorado, USA.
Dennis G Fitz-PatrickDepartment of Research, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
J Gregory CollinsDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Joseph G HentzDepartment of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Brie N NobleDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Oregon State University College of Pharmacy, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Qing WuSchool of Public Health and Nevada Institute of Personalized Medicine at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Karina BrazdysClinical Research Practice, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Bentley J BobrowDepartment of Emergency Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, Texas, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USWinnMed · USMayo Clinic · USAPLA Health · USOregon State University · USPenrose-St. Francis Health Services · USSt. Anthony Hospital · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Efficacy of telemedicine for stroke was first established by the Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera (STRokE DOC) trials in California and Arizona. Following these randomized controlled trials, the Stroke Telemedicine for Arizona Rural Residents (STARR) network was the first telestroke network to be established in Arizona. It consisted of a 7 spoke 1 hub telestroke system, and it was designed to serve rural, remote, or neurologically underserved communities. Objective: The objective of STARR was to establish a multicenter state-wide telestroke research network to determine the feasibility of prospective collection, recording, and regularly analysis of telestroke patient consultations and care data for the purposes of establishing quality measures, improvement, and benchmarking against other national and international telestroke programs. Methods: The STARR trial was open to enrollment for 29 months from 2008 to 2011. Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona served as the hub primary stroke center and its vascular neurologists provided emergency telestroke consultations to seven participating rural, remote, or underserved spoke community hospitals in Arizona. Eligibility criteria for activation of a telestroke alert and study enrollment were established. Consecutive patients exhibiting symptoms and signs of acute stroke within a 12 h window were enrolled, assessed, and treated by telemedicine. The state government sponsor, Arizona Department of Health Services' research grant covered the cost of acquisition, maintenance, and service of the selected telemedicine equipment as well as the professional telestroke services provided. The study deployed multiple telemedicine video cart systems, picture archive and communications systems software, and call management solutions. The STARR protocol was reviewed and approved by Mayo Clinic IRB, which served as the central IRB of record for all the participating hospitals, and the trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Results: The telestroke hotline was activated 537 times, and ultimately 443 subjects met criteria and consented to participate. The STARR successfully established a multicenter state-wide telestroke research network. The STARR developed a feasible and pragmatic approach to the prospective collection, storage, and analysis of telestroke patient consultations and care data for the purposes of establishing quality measures and tracking improvement. STARR benchmarked well against other national and international telestroke programs. STARR helped set the foundation for multiple regional and state telestroke networks and ultimately evolved into a national telestroke network. Conclusions: Multiple small and rurally located community hospitals and health systems can successfully collaborate with a more centrally located larger hospital center through telemedicine technologies to develop a coordinated approach to the assessment, diagnosis, and emergency treatment of patients manifesting symptoms and signs of an acute stroke syndrome. This model may serve well the needs of patients presenting with other time-sensitive medical emergencies.Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT00829361.

Indexed as

alteplasedigital healthstroketelemedicinetelestrokethrombolysis

Identifiers

PMID35720454
PMCPMC9052207
OpenAlexW4221088594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.