Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35720375›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2022

Antimicrobial Peptide Mimics for Clinical Use: Does Size Matter?

Johan Svenson, Natalia Molchanova, Christina I Schroeder

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Proline-Modified (RW)ACS omega · 2025
    Article
  10. The Contribution of Human Antimicrobial Peptides to Fungi.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Reprogramming cancer immunity with next-generation combination therapies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Pyrgos[Science advances · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Johan SvensonCawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.
Natalia MolchanovaThe Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Christina I SchroederCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, United States.
Cawthron Institute · NZLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Discovery and development of voltage-gated sodium channel inhibitorsZIABC012003 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SCHROEDER, INGRID · 2020 to 2022
$291k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC012003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for efficient antimicrobial therapies that can alleviate suffering caused by infections from resistant bacteria is more urgent than ever before. Infections caused by multi-resistant pathogens represent a significant and increasing burden to healthcare and society and researcher are investigating new classes of bioactive compounds to slow down this development. Antimicrobial peptides from the innate immune system represent one promising class that offers a potential solution to the antibiotic resistance problem due to their mode of action on the microbial membranes. However, challenges associated with pharmacokinetics, bioavailability and off-target toxicity are slowing down the advancement and use of innate defensive peptides. Improving the therapeutic properties of these peptides is a strategy for reducing the clinical limitations and synthetic mimics of antimicrobial peptides are emerging as a promising class of molecules for a variety of antimicrobial applications. These compounds can be made significantly shorter while maintaining, or even improving antimicrobial properties, and several downsized synthetic mimics are now in clinical development for a range of infectious diseases. A variety of strategies can be employed to prepare these small compounds and this review describes the different compounds developed to date by adhering to a minimum pharmacophore based on an amphiphilic balance between cationic charge and hydrophobicity. These compounds can be made as small as dipeptides, circumventing the need for large compounds with elaborate three-dimensional structures to generate simplified and potent antimicrobial mimics for a range of medical applications. This review highlight key and recent development in the field of small antimicrobial peptide mimics as a promising class of antimicrobials, illustrating just how small you can go.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial PeptidesBacteriaAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesAntimicrobial Peptidesamphiphilicantibioticantimicrobial peptidesclinical developmentpeptidomimeticsresistant bacteriasynthetic mimic

Identifiers

PMID35720375
PMCPMC9204644
OpenAlexW4281615989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.