ReviewiScience2022
Prevention and removal of membrane and separator biofouling in bioelectrochemical systems: a comprehensive review.
Review in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced voltage generation in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) using bacterial isolates from seawater and industrial wastewater.Microbial cell factories · 2025Article
- Mitigation Techniques of Membranes' Biofouling in Bioelectrochemical Cells (BEC Cells): Recent Advances.Membranes · 2025Review
- Sustainable Power Generation with an All-Silk Electronics-Based Yeast Wearable Biobattery.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Novel ionic liquid-infused PVA-based anion exchange membranes boosting bioelectricity yield from microbial fuel cells.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Microbial Biofilms: Features of Formation and Potential for Use in Bioelectrochemical Devices.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) have made significant progress in recent years in all aspects of their technology. BESs usually work with a membrane or a separator, which is one of their most critical components affecting performance. Quite often, biofilm from either the anolyte or catholyte forms on the membrane, which can negatively affect its performance. In critical cases, the long-term power performance observed for microbial fuel cells (MFCs) has dropped by over 90%. Surface modification and composite material approaches as well as chemical and physical cleaning techniques involving surfactants, acids, hydroxides, and ultrasounds have been successfully implemented to combat biofilm formation. Surface modifications produced up to 6-7 times higher power performance in the long-term, whereas regeneration strategies resulted in up to 100% recovery of original performance. Further studies include tools such as fluid dynamics-based design and plasma cleaning. The biofouling area is still underexplored in the field of bioelectrochemistry and requires systematic improvement. Therefore, this review summarizes the most recent knowledge with the aim of helping the research and engineering community select the best strategy and discuss further perspectives for combating the undesirable biofilm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.