ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022
Validation of Deep Learning-Based DFCNN in Extremely Large-Scale Virtual Screening and Application in Trypsin I Protease Inhibitor Discovery.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-driven drug discovery: a deep learning paradigm shift in pharmaceutical research and development.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Neuroprotective effects of chemical constituents from Nicotiana tabacum L. in Parkinson's disease.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing GPCR-ligand predictions: DeepGPCR with experimental validation for high-precision drug discovery.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- DeepBindGCN: Integrating Molecular Vector Representation with Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Protein-Ligand Interaction Prediction.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational methods with affordable computational resources are highly desirable for identifying active drug leads from millions of compounds. This requires a model that is both highly efficient and relatively accurate, which cannot be achieved by most of the current methods. In real virtual screening (VS) application scenarios, the desired method should perform much better in selecting active compounds by prediction than by random chance. Here, we systematically evaluate the performance of our previously developed DFCNN model in large-scale virtual screening, and the results show our method has approximately 22 times the success rate compared to the random chance on average with a score cutoff of 0.99. Of the 102 test cases, 10 cases have more than 98 times the success rate of a random guess. Interestingly, in three cases, the prediction success rate is 99 times that of a random guess by a score cutoff of 0.99. This indicates that in most situations after our extremely large-scale VS, the dataset can be reduced 20 to 100 times for the next step of virtual screening based on docking or MD simulation. Furthermore, we have employed an experimental method to verify our computational method by finding several activity inhibitors for Trypsin I Protease. In addition, we also show its proof-of-concept application in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.