Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35720125›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

Validation of Deep Learning-Based DFCNN in Extremely Large-Scale Virtual Screening and Application in Trypsin I Protease Inhibitor Discovery.

Haiping Zhang, Xiao Lin, Yanjie Wei, Huiling Zhang, Linbu Liao, Hao Wu, Yi Pan, Xuli Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haiping ZhangCenter for High Performance Computing, Joint Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data Intelligent Analysis Technology, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Xiao LinSchool of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yanjie WeiCenter for High Performance Computing, Joint Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data Intelligent Analysis Technology, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Huiling ZhangCenter for High Performance Computing, Joint Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data Intelligent Analysis Technology, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Linbu LiaoCollege of Software Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Hao WuCenter for High Performance Computing, Joint Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data Intelligent Analysis Technology, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Yi PanCenter for High Performance Computing, Joint Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data Intelligent Analysis Technology, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Xuli WuSchool of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational methods with affordable computational resources are highly desirable for identifying active drug leads from millions of compounds. This requires a model that is both highly efficient and relatively accurate, which cannot be achieved by most of the current methods. In real virtual screening (VS) application scenarios, the desired method should perform much better in selecting active compounds by prediction than by random chance. Here, we systematically evaluate the performance of our previously developed DFCNN model in large-scale virtual screening, and the results show our method has approximately 22 times the success rate compared to the random chance on average with a score cutoff of 0.99. Of the 102 test cases, 10 cases have more than 98 times the success rate of a random guess. Interestingly, in three cases, the prediction success rate is 99 times that of a random guess by a score cutoff of 0.99. This indicates that in most situations after our extremely large-scale VS, the dataset can be reduced 20 to 100 times for the next step of virtual screening based on docking or MD simulation. Furthermore, we have employed an experimental method to verify our computational method by finding several activity inhibitors for Trypsin I Protease. In addition, we also show its proof-of-concept application in

Indexed as

deep learningde novo drug screeningDFCNNextremely large-scale virtual screeningTrypsin I Protease

Identifiers

PMID35720125
PMCPMC9200220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.