ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022
DEER Data Analysis Software: A Comparative Guide.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- EPR spectroscopy 80 years after its discovery.Science advances · 2026Review
- Large-scale protein conformational transitions revealed by weighted ensemble simulations and EPR.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Protocol for preparing and characterizing samples for combined microsecond freeze-hyperquenching and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- Conformational dynamics and asymmetry in multimodal inhibition of membrane-bound pyrophosphatases.eLife · 2025Article
- Structure and Nitrite Reductase Activity of the Di-iron Protein ScdA inJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- ih-RIDME: a pulse EPR experiment to probe the heterogeneous nuclear environment.Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2025Article
- Review
- Pulsed Dipolar EPR for Self-Limited Complexes of Oligonucleotides Studies.Biomolecules · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulsed dipolar electron paramagnetic resonance (PDEPR) spectroscopy experiments measure the dipolar coupling, and therefore nanometer-scale distances and distance distributions, between paramagnetic centers. Of the family of PDEPR experiments, the most commonly used pulsed sequence is four-pulse double electron resonance (DEER, also known as PELDOR). There are several ways to analyze DEER data to extract distance distributions, and this may appear overwhelming at first. This work compares and reviews six of the packages, and a brief getting started guide for each is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.