ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Comatose Patients After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: An Analysis Based on Quantitative Methods of EEG Reactivity.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robust EEG Characteristics for Predicting Neurological Recovery from Coma After Cardiac Arrest.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Updated information on neuro-prognosticative tools to predict outcomes for patients with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy induced by cardiac arrest.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Every year, approximately 50-110/1,00,000 people worldwide suffer from cardiac arrest, followed by hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and approximately 40-66% of patients do not recover. The purpose of this study was to identify the brain network parameters and key brain regions associated with awakening by comparing the reactivity characteristics of the brain networks between the awakening and unawakening groups of CPR patients after coma, thereby providing a basis for further awakening interventions. Method: This study involved a prospective cohort study. Using a 64-electrode electroencephalography (EEG) wireless 64A system, EEG signals were recorded from 16 comatose patients after CPR in the acute phase (<1 month) from 2019 to 2020. MATLAB (2017b) was used to quantitatively analyze the reactivity (power spectrum and entropy) and brain network characteristics (coherence and phase lag index) after pain stimulation. The patients were divided into an awakening group and an unawakening group based on their ability to execute commands or engage in repeated and continuous purposeful behavior after 3 months. The above parameters were compared to determine whether there were differences between the two groups. Results: (1) Power spectrum: the awakening group had higher gamma, beta and alpha spectral power after pain stimulation in the frontal and parietal lobes, and lower delta and theta spectral power in the bilateral temporal and occipital lobes than the unawakening group. (2) Entropy: after pain stimulation, the awakening group had higher entropy in the frontal and parietal lobes and lower entropy in the temporal occipital lobes than the unawakening group. (3) Connectivity: after pain stimulation, the awakening group had stronger gamma and beta connectivity in nearly the whole brain, but weaker theta and delta connectivity in some brain regions (e.g., the frontal-occipital lobe and parietal-occipital lobe) than the unawakening group. Conclusion: After CPR, comatose patients were more likely to awaken if there was a higher stimulation of fast-frequency band spectral power, higher entropy, stronger whole-brain connectivity and better retention of frontal-parietal lobe function after pain stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.