ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Differences in the Impact of Heart Rate Variability on the Surgical Approach in Patients With Early Cervical Cancer: Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence suggests that the risk of recurrence and death in patients with early cervical cancer (ECC) undergoing minimally invasive surgery is significantly higher than that in patients undergoing open surgery. However, the mechanisms underlying such a difference remain unclear. Heart rate variability (HRV) represents autonomic nerve activity, which is related to tumorgenesis and can be used as a prognostic indicator for various cancers. The main purpose of this study was to explore the difference in the effects of laparoscopic and open surgery on HRV in ECC patients. Methods: A total of 68 ECC (FIGO IA1 with lymphovascular space invasion -IIA2) patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for the first time (84% open group vs. 16% laparoscopic group) were included. A single-lead micro-ECG recorder was used to collect 5 min electrocardiograms 1 day before the operation and 3 days after the operation, and then HRV time domain and frequency domain indices were analyzed, including mean heart rate (MeanHR), maximum heart rate (MaxHR), minimum heart rate (MinHR), the standard deviation of all normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN), the root mean square of successive interval differences (RMSSD), very low-frequency power (VLF), low-frequency power (LF), high-frequency power (HF), total power (TP), and the ratio of LF to HF (LF/HF). Results: Heart rate (i.e., MeanHR, MaxHR, and MinHR) were significantly higher, and HRV (i.e., SDNN, RMSSD, LF, HF, and TP) were significantly lower after the operation than before the operation in both the laparoscopic and open groups ( Conclusions: These data suggest that radical hysterectomy can lead to increased heart rate and decreased HRV in patients with ECC, which can negatively affect cardiac autonomic regulation. Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery has a greater negative impact on the HRV of ECC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.