Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35719859›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science & technology letters2022

Communicating Confidence of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Identification via High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry.

Joseph A Charbonnet, Carrie A McDonough, Feng Xiao, Trever Schwichtenberg, Dunping Cao, Sarit Kaserzon, Kevin V Thomas, Pradeep Dewapriya, Benjamin J Place, Emma L Schymanski and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science & technology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
22.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 228 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Large declines in organofluorine contamination indicated by subarctic marine mammal tissues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Joseph A CharbonnetDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8766-6072
Carrie A McDonoughDepartment of Civil Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5152-8495
Feng XiaoDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58202, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5686-6055
Trever SchwichtenbergDepartment of Chemistry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7882-4665
Dunping CaoDepartment of Chemistry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States.
Sarit KaserzonQueensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences (QAEHS), The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6744-1279
Kevin V ThomasQueensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences (QAEHS), The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2155-100X
Pradeep DewapriyaQueensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences (QAEHS), The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6383-1843
Benjamin J PlaceNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0953-5215
Emma L SchymanskiLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Belvaux 4362, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6868-8145
Jennifer A FieldDepartment of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9346-4693
Damian E HelblingSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2588-145X
Christopher P HigginsDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6220-8673
The University of Queensland · AUOregon State University · USColorado School of Mines · USCornell University · USNational Institute of Standards and Technology · USStony Brook University · USUniversity of Luxembourg · LUUniversity of North Dakota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are important environmental contaminants, yet relatively few analytical reference standards exist for this class. Nontarget analyses performed by means of high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) are increasingly common for the discovery and identification of PFASs in environmental and biological samples. The certainty of PFAS identifications made via HRMS must be communicated through a reliable and harmonized approach. Here, we present a confidence scale along with identification criteria specific to suspect or nontarget analysis of PFASs by means of nontarget HRMS. Confidence levels range from level 1a-"Confirmed by Reference Standard," and level 1b-"Indistinguishable from Reference Standard," to level 5-"Exact Masses of Interest," which are identified by suspect screening or data filtering, two common forms of feature prioritization. This confidence scale is consistent with general criteria for communicating confidence in the identification of small organic molecules by HRMS (e.g., through a match to analytical reference standards, library MS/MS, and/or retention times) but incorporates the specific conventions and tools used in PFAS classification and analysis (e.g., detection of homologous series and specific ranges of mass defects). Our scale clarifies the level of certainty in PFAS identification and, in doing so, facilitates more efficient identification.

Identifiers

PMID35719859
PMCPMC9202347
OpenAlexW4281569726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.