Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35719832›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

CT Colonography and Colorectal Carcinoma: Current Trends and Emerging Developments.

Monika Kadari, Muhammad Subhan, Nisha Saji Parel, Parimi Vamsi Krishna, Anuradha Gupta, Kamsika Uthayaseelan, Kivonika Uthayaseelan, Naga Anjani Bhaskar Srinivas Sunkara

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Monika KadariInternal Medicine, Bhaskar Medical College, Hyderabad, IND.
Muhammad SubhanInternal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Nisha Saji ParelFamily Medicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, GEO.
Parimi Vamsi KrishnaInternal Medicine, Jagadguru Jayadeva Murugarajendra Medical College, Davangere, IND.
Anuradha GuptaResearch, Government Medical College Nagpur, Nagpur, IND.
Kamsika UthayaseelanInternal Medicine, All Saints University College of Medicine, St. Vincent & the Grenadines, Kingstown, VCT.
Kivonika UthayaseelanInternal Medicine, All Saints University School of Medicine, Dominica, Roseau, DMA.
Naga Anjani Bhaskar Srinivas SunkaraInternal Medicine, Jagadguru Jayadeva Murugarajendra Medical College, Davangere, IND.
Allama Iqbal Medical College · PKDominica State College · DMGandhi Medical College & Hospital · INGovernment Medical College · INSaint Vincent Health System · USTbilisi State Medical University · GE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal carcinoma is the third most malignant and second leading cause of death from cancer. The cruelty of this entity is that it takes decades to be symptomatic and is known to be detected late in its timeline by a screening technique. The fatality of this carcinoma only means heightened importance of screening guidelines to be laid down and strict follow-ups by the healthcare providers. A novel method, a potential competitor that could now replace the present screening techniques for colorectal carcinoma, is computed tomographic colonography (CTC) or virtual colonoscopy. Though it first came into existence in 1994, this method is yet to be deeply studied and scrutinized for it to be the next benchmark modality. This review has mainly focused on the various features of CTC. It is contrasted against the gold standard colonoscopy for its superiority, efficacy, cost-effectiveness, patient logistics, and role in detecting extra-colonic lesions. The main focus would be laid on CTC being a screening modality. The review also emphasized why there is a need for the current healthcare providers to incorporate this modality into their practice widely. Although much has been said about CTC and its various aspects of cost-effectiveness, about it being replaced or supplemented for cancer screening, a collaborative effort has to be made by both the fields of radiology and gastroenterology to investigate the outcomes of this not so new technique in daily practice and to avoid misinterpretation of the results due to lack of skill and proficiency.

Indexed as

barium enemacolon cancer preventioncolo rectal cancercolorectal polypct colonographyflexible sigmoidoscopyfobtinvasive colon cancerscreening colonoscopyspiral ct

Identifiers

PMID35719832
PMCPMC9191267
OpenAlexW4280633423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.