ArticleCureus2022
Dosimetric Superiority of High-Dose-Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy Using a Surface Mold Applicator for Primary Cutaneous Angiosarcoma of the Scalp.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility of Customized Thermoplastic Patient-Specific Helmet Bolus for Scalp Irradiation Using Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Planning.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of the dose-volume parameters of the target lesions and the radiation dose to the organ at risk (OAR) in two patients with primary cutaneous angiosarcoma of the scalp (CAS) treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) using a surface mold applicator. In 2020, two men, aged 80 years and 60 years, respectively, were treated with HDR-BT with paclitaxel for CAS with no distant metastases and no surgical indication at our institution. The total irradiated dose was 57 Gy administered in daily fractions of 3 Gy four days per week. The method of HDR-BT involved the construction of a helmet that fitted over the patient's head, with parallel catheters fixed to the outside at 2.0 cm intervals to transport the iridium-192 HDR-BT source. In conclusion, HDR-BT may be superior when the dose to the target lesion plays a more important role than the OAR dose in selecting radiotherapy modalities for CAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.